The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6583 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Edward Mountain
I will go to the deputy convener because he needs to get in his question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Edward Mountain
The next item of business is consideration of a type 1 consent notification relating to a proposed United Kingdom statutory instrument to amend the Green Gas Support Scheme Regulations 2021.
On 1 March, the Minister for Zero Carbon Buildings, Active Travel and Tenants’ Rights notified the committee of the proposed UK SI, whereby the UK Government is seeking the Scottish Government’s consent to legislate in an area of devolved competence. The committee’s role is to decide whether it agrees with the Scottish Government’s proposal to consent to the UK Government making the regulations within devolved competence and in the manner that the UK Government has indicated to the Scottish Government.
If members are content for consent to be given, the committee will write to the Scottish Government accordingly. In writing to the Scottish Government, we have the option to pose questions or to ask to be kept up to date on relevant developments.
If the committee is not content with the proposal, we may make one of the two recommendations that are outlined in the clerk’s note, which I do not propose to go through at the moment. Do members have any views on the proposal, or are members content with it?
As no one has indicated that they have any views, I will move to the substantive question. Is the committee content that the provision set out in the notification should be made in the proposed UK statutory instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Edward Mountain
Our next agenda item is an evidence session on natural capital finance in Scotland. On our first panel, I am pleased to welcome Stuart Greenwood, who is a partner in Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP’s rural property and business team; Joel Paterson, who is the head of natural capital in Scotland at Strutt & Parker; Stephen Young, who is director of policy at Scottish Land & Estates; and Olly Hughes, who is managing director of forestry at Gresham House. Olly, thank you for agreeing to join us at slightly the last minute.
It will be an interesting session, and I know that members will have lots of questions. The temptation for witnesses is to want to answer every single question. As nice as that might be for you, it is not possible for me because it would mean that I cut out some of the committee members, which would cause a disagreement afterwards that I would have to resolve. If you agree with what somebody said, you do not need to say any more, but, if you want to come in, try to catch my eye or the member’s eye and we will bring you in, and I will try not to cut you off.
Before we go into the session, I remind members of my entry in the register of members’ interests, in that I am a member of a family farming partnership. We farm 500 acres of land that I own in Speyside, and we are tenant farmers of another 500 acres in Speyside. I can say quite categorically at this stage that I have not invested in natural capital, because I do not understand it. Maybe all will become clearer today.
The first questions are from Bob Doris.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Edward Mountain
Douglas Lumsden has some questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Edward Mountain
It sounds a bit like a Ponzi scheme to me, but maybe I have it wrong.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Edward Mountain
The deputy convener is next. You are up, Ben.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Edward Mountain
Bob Doris has a quick question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Edward Mountain
I have a few quick-fire questions, because we are very nearly at the end of our session. The first question is for Olly Hughes. You said that Gresham House has managed land. It also owns land, does it not? If so, how much land does it own?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Edward Mountain
Okay. If you could perhaps let us know how much land Gresham House owns, that would be useful.
I am a little concerned. We have talked about releasing money by selling things into the future. To me, the risk seems unquantifiable for 99 years and for 50 years. Farmers may well need those carbon credits to be able to continue to farm, because one thing is for sure: industries will force down to the primary producer their obligations to reach net zero. There is a huge risk.
Forestry and Land Scotland and NatureScot have no risk. Between them, they own 670,000 hectares of Scotland. Should they trade all their credits? Would that be your advice to them?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Edward Mountain
Would you advise it to do that, Joel Paterson, if you were trading for it?