The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6524 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Edward Mountain
As I alluded to when speaking to the previous group, I will make a slightly fuller declaration of interests than I did the last time. I remind members of my entry in the register of members’ interests, which says that I own and manage approximately 500 acres of farmland in Moray. I have been involved in deer management for more than 50 years. I have written deer management plans for various deer management groups across Scotland, some of which—I am pleased to say—still remain in force; they have stood the test of time.
My amendment 131 would place a duty on ministers to ensure that rural employment associated with deer management is not just protected but promoted in the bill. Organisations such as the British Association for Shooting and Conservation, Scottish Land & Estates and the Scottish Gamekeepers Association have shared with me their concerns about the lack of safeguarding of jobs and livelihoods relating to deer management. Those jobs and livelihoods must never be sacrificed to meet the aim of the Government, and of some other people, to turbocharge deer reduction.
I will talk about that when we come to the next section, but—to be frank—a lot of full-time jobs are being pushed sideways on to contract killers who are brought in to kill deer. Deer managers and gamekeepers have real concerns about the fact that the bill does not recognise the invaluable work that they do. Not only is shooting worth about £760 million to the Scottish economy; the bill risks undermining the very jobs on which we rely.
Minister, the other day, you chaired a meeting—kindly and with skill—of a group that was set up as a result of the Dava fires to discuss the importance of ensuring that such fires are controlled. To me, it was clear that it was a lot of gamekeepers and deer managers who actually stopped those fires spreading beyond where they did and prevented damage from being incurred across a wider area. In fact, I believe that the selfless action of those people prevented the loss of life. It seems only right, therefore, that we should be protecting those jobs and ensuring that, when it comes to deer management, we give them due consideration.
I could speak to Tim Eagle’s amendments, but I am not going to do so. I am interested specifically in Mark Ruskell’s amendment 28, and I want to hear what he says, because it would appear that he proposes to shift deer control out of the control of NatureScot or Scottish Natural Heritage—whatever it is now.
Perhaps that is a reversion to the good old days, when deer management was done by an organisation called the Deer Commission for Scotland. It was a Government organisation—perhaps the minister will remember it—that drew everyone together, helped to set cull targets and worked extremely well in the field of deer management. It was collaborative and wide ranging, and everyone felt that they had a say. There was some stick behind its powers, but it was unfortunately dissolved by the Government in 2010 and subsumed within Scottish Natural Heritage—something that has, I think, been to the detriment of deer management.
If Mark Ruskell’s amendment 28 seeks to bring back the Deer Commission for Scotland into a separate organisation, I will be bound to support it—which might be the kiss of death to it, Mr Ruskell. We will wait and see, convener. I have nothing further to add on that matter.
11:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Edward Mountain
I know that you think through your amendments carefully, but my concern with this is that landlords might not own the sporting rights in areas where they have tenancies, whether they be crofting or elsewhere. What checks have you done to make sure that giving the tenant a right to do something that interferes with the sporting right does not leave the Government legally at sea by giving someone a right that impinges on somebody else’s right, for which they might already have paid money?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
I think that we are in danger of stretching one question to four, but I think that you have gone as far as you can on that, Sarah.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
The deputy convener wants to come in with a few points.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
I did.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
You have said that you support the general principles of the bill. Will you explain briefly why you support its general principles and why you feel that there is a gap in Scots law?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
I do not want to tread on the toes of my fellow committee members, who might want to delve into those, so I will leave that for the moment. Is there anything else that you want to say?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
I am sure that we will see, during the evidence session, if that is how the bill is perceived.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
Cabinet secretary, I think that Charles Stewart Roper wants to come in, but it is up to you whether you let him.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
I know, but I just wanted to put on the record—to confirm what Mr Stewart said—that this is not the only thing that we are dealing with.
We have two short questions, one from Sarah Boyack and one from Mark Ruskell.