The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5973 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
In the hope that I am not the odd one that sneaked in, it is back to you, convener.
11:15Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
You would know about the responsibilities of declarations of interests in the Parliament better than most other MSPs, convener.
To take my point to the next step, you are content that, if you chose to stand to be an MP as an MSP, you would resign. Your proposal would be that you would resign if you were elected as an MP and that you would not have to resign beforehand.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
If an MSP stood for election to become an MP, you are content that, if they then became an MP, they would be given eight days in which to resign. I think that is the period that is being suggested.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
They would not have to resign before the election.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
I have my own views on dual mandates and whether it is possible to do both jobs. I find doing the job that I am doing already to be quite intense, so I am not sure that I would look for another job.
I put it to Alice Kinghorn-Gray that we are in a situation in which councillors get elected to become MSPs and, because of the way that the elections fall, there is about a year before the council elections. Do you think that there is an argument that councillors who become MSPs should continue for that year, so as not to cause an extensive cost to the taxpayers? They can probably still do that job for that short period of time if council meetings are on Mondays and Fridays. Do you have a view on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
Okay—I will definitely leave that one there. I tend to agree in that I think that our job as MSPs is a full-time one, and I struggle to find time to do much else on occasions.
Turning to what, for me, is a very important point, Graham Simpson is producing a bill on recall, which you will have seen. In my opinion, the electorate must have a right to recall people if they are not performing. We do it in councils, so there is no reason why we should not do it in the Scottish Parliament, too, albeit that there is a slight issue for the likes of me, as a regional MSP. First, do you think that it is right? Secondly, how would you get round the problems with regional MSPs? You would have to consult people in more than one constituency, and we saw how difficult things were last year when there was a recall petition.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
You can try, but there is always an odd one who sneaks in.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
On the mechanics of the unexpected happening unexpectedly, if I remember rightly, the EMB changed the rules during Covid to allow MSPs to remain in post right up until the day prior to the election, so that, if there was a crisis, we could come back and sit. If it is down to MSPs to make the decision, I point out that, if something happens once the Parliament has been dissolved, there will be no MSPs, but there will be ministers and cabinet secretaries, because they stay in post. How do we get around that? Does some thought need to be given to that issue? I am slightly concerned that the decision would sit with the Government, as it would be the only body with people still in their positions, and those of us who might have a different opinion would not be heard, because we would not exist.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
I will push back slightly on that. I absolutely agree that MSPs remaining in post might present difficulties. My fear is about how votes would be weighted in an advisory committee. If the votes were weighted as they are in the Parliamentary Bureau, the decision would purely be down to the Government, so, if the Government had an absolute majority, the advisory committee would be a waste of time. Personally, I favour an outside organisation taking control, as Toby James sort of suggested. I will push you slightly to give an answer and then come back to Alistair Clark.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
I get all the easy ones, convener.
For non-devolved elections, people can vote from overseas. Should they be allowed to do that, and would it be safe to allow people to vote from overseas in Scottish elections?