The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6078 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 5, Against 2, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 508 agreed to.
Amendments 509, 491 and 492 moved—[Mairi Gougeon]—and agreed to.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I am just trying to work out when the best moment is for a brief pause. I will push on a bit in the hope that that entices you all to keep moving in the right direction.
The next group is on assignation and succession. Amendment 184, in the name of the cabinet secretary, is grouped with amendments 185 to 215, 230 to 233 and 305 to 308. I ask the cabinet secretary to move amendment 184 and speak to all the amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendments 185 to 215, 510, 493 and 496 be agreed to. [Interruption.] Sorry—I knew that I would get that wrong. I will clarify that. The question is, that amendments 185 to 215, 510 and 493 to 496 be agreed to.
Amendments 185 to 215, 510 and 493 to 496 agreed to.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Right—I need to get back online with the script.
Amendment 216, in the name of Tim Eagle, has been debated with amendment 488. Do you wish to move or not move the amendment, Tim?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 218 disagreed to.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Amendment 219, Mr Eagle—I got the numbers in the right order.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
In this group, yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Sorry, Mr Ewing, I cannot hear your dulcet tones as well as I would like to. Can you adjust the microphone? That is it. Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I call Tim Eagle to speak to amendment 508A and any other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I am sure that Monica Lennon will respond to the following points when she winds up. To correct Michael Matheson, which I do not do without being careful, the Crown Estate has estates on land as well as at sea. Those estates are spread across Scotland and are not only agricultural. The Crown Estate has other interests as well.
I tend to agree with Monica Lennon that Crown Estate reform was probably overdue when it was carried out. It is a journey that we are only part of the way through, and we are waiting to see its full effects. I have long argued about the issue of which organisation should realistically get the income from ScotWind and whether that should be Crown Estate Scotland or the Scottish Government. The sale of a long-term lease is actually revenue, so a percentage is kept by the Crown Estate and a percentage goes to the Government, and capital has to be reinvested back by the Crown Estate into the estate itself.
I am taken by the fact that, 19 years ago, Bidwells—I declare that I worked there then—managed Crown Estate lands in a part of Scotland. It was interesting due to the complexity of the management of those lands, which was not carried out by the Crown Estate but by surveyors and by several firms around Scotland. That ensured that there was the capacity to manage the land. I strongly question whether local authorities would have the scope to carry out the management of the Crown estate foreshore if that were to be passed over to them.
I also agree with the deputy convener that, when it comes to the management of the Crown estate, it is good that that is done by a central body across Scotland. That means that there is no dubiety and that there are not the huge variations that there could be in, say, how much local authorities charge for even a minor thing such as the mooring of a buoy on the seabed .
I am nervous about the amendments. I can see why they might be attractive, but maybe the cabinet secretary can set all our minds at rest. We come to you now, cabinet secretary.