The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5973 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Edward Mountain
Bob Doris has a sequence of questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Edward Mountain
When it comes to buying an estate for natural capital, for example, a management plan that was drawn up would have to be quite detailed, would it not? It would probably have the planting schemes on a year-by-year basis and the harvesting scheme, which would be quite complex. Jill Robbie has sort of nodded.
What I am trying to get at is that that is not something that will just happen overnight. Two years ago, the state bought Glen Prosen, which is only 3,000 hectares, and it still has not come up with a management plan for it, for goodness’ sake. That will not happen overnight, will it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Edward Mountain
What is not clear to me is whether, if you had cattle and an average 365-day calving interval—which meant that you were reducing the amount of barren periods—that would be sufficient to prove that you were moving towards net zero. Would it be sufficient if, say, your lambing percentage was up above 100 per cent, because you were not carrying excess animals? I do not know—that is unclear.
Does Douglas Lumsden want to ask a question?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Edward Mountain
I have some quick-fire questions before I let Monica Lennon come back in, and I fear that they will be for Don Macleod and Jill Robbie.
You said that what the bill sets out in relation to the community right to buy is fearfully complex and that we have not sorted out the previous arrangement. Does the bill make sense on community right to buy?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Edward Mountain
You can.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Edward Mountain
Douglas Lumsden will ask the first question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Edward Mountain
The concern is that some of the smaller holdings—and there are very few of them, as Grierson Dunlop was right to point out—fall outside the crofting counties. The complexities of making them part of crofts make it easier to make them agricultural tenancies instead or to bring them in line with agricultural tenancy. I would be interested to hear what others have to say about that.
Ben Macpherson has the next questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Edward Mountain
Thanks, Ben.
Mark, I think that you have some questions now.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Edward Mountain
If someone diversified a proportion of the holding to the extent that farming the remainder of the holding became impossible, would that be allowed? Is there a concern about that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2024
Edward Mountain
I want to check that I understand what you are saying. Let us take the example of a 600-hectare farm. Let us say that a proposal was made to use 300 hectares of it for Christmas trees, for example, because the existing farmer wanted to run a smaller number of sheep and cattle. Subsequently, it would be impossible to farm a greater number of sheep and cattle, because the land would be being used for Christmas trees. What rights does the landlord have in that situation, or does he not have any?