The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6874 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Edward Mountain
The next questions will come from Mark Ruskell.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Edward Mountain
I understand that, but I also understand that the low-hanging fruit are urban centres where buses, bicycling and changing the use of streets make more sense. In rural areas, they do not make a lot of sense.
I want to go back to a point that I made earlier. I am completely confused, because I went through the costs and benefits, which none of the witnesses have challenged me on, and I am sure you would have looked at them. I gave you a non-cumulative benefit figure that was identified by the Government in annex 3. If you add those figures together, it comes to a total financial benefit figure of £26 billion, with a cost estimate of £12.7 billion. I am interested that you did not challenge me on the figures that I gave you, because I tripped myself up to find out whether that was an area that you had looked at, but you have not really looked at the costs of this and were not able to challenge me on it. You just accepted the figures that I gave you, even though they were incorrect. Why would that give me confidence that what you are suggesting will be correct?
Adrian Davis, as you answered, I will come to you first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Edward Mountain
I am just saying that I have struggled, like most people who have picked up the massive climate change plan. It is massive, and it formed a good part of my Christmas reading—that is probably a sorry state of affairs to be in. I have looked at the figures, and I cannot make them work. Having quoted the figures at you, I am interested to see that you do not seem to be able to make them work either. Maybe the Government will understand them.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Edward Mountain
In relation to the evidence that we have heard so far, I want to drag us back to the Highlands and Islands, which is the area that I live in. We do not have such transport routes. Yesterday, there were no trains and no buses. If I had jumped on a bicycle to get here, I would probably have got only as far as Aviemore by now. How do we sell this policy to the people who are not the low-hanging fruit, who might be penalised by some of the things that have been suggested?
Sara, do you want to have a go at answering that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Edward Mountain
I am sorry—I am in the most impossible situation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Edward Mountain
Monica, have you a brief follow-up for anyone in particular?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Edward Mountain
Welcome back. Our fourth item of business is an evidence session on the Scottish Government’s draft climate change plan, which sets out how the Government intends to meet its carbon reduction targets. The committee is leading a cross-committee effort to scrutinise the draft plan, and the Scottish Government has said that it will lay the final plan by the end of March. Everyone who gives evidence today will be contributing to a report that we will publish in, I hope, late February, with a debate in the chamber to follow.
I welcome to the meeting Lloyd Austin, policy adviser for Stop Climate Chaos Scotland; Professor James Curran, a member of the Climate Emergency Response Group; Dr Mark Winskel, a senior lecturer at the University of Edinburgh; Jess Pepper, the founder and director of Climate Café; and Professor Kevin Anderson, a professor of energy and climate change at the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. I thank all the witnesses for attending the meeting.
This evidence session is intended to provide an overview of the whole draft climate change plan, without a focus on any specific policy. We will go straight to questions. As convener, I get to ask the first question, which is always an easy one—the warmer into the bank, as it were—to allow you to express your views. Given that there are five witnesses, it will not be possible for everyone to answer every question that is asked. To help me, if you agree with something that somebody said earlier, you do not have to repeat it. It would be great if you could just say that you agree or that you do not agree and then say why, because that will save a bit of time. We have about two hours for this evidence session.
It is seven years since we had a full climate change plan, and it is five years since the climate change plan update. A lot of countries, including Scotland, have adopted an ambition for net zero emissions, with the intention of achieving the Paris agreement targets on temperature increase. In your view—you will all get a chance to answer this question—what are the key things that have changed?
I will bring in Lloyd Austin first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Edward Mountain
We come to questions from Monica Lennon, who is joining us online.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Edward Mountain
From what I have heard, they are more expensive and they can do fewer runs, so hauliers are not keen on them.
Kevin Stewart wants to follow up on that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Edward Mountain
I will hand straight back to Douglas Lumsden, because we all jumped in on his question.