The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6348 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Thank you very much.
That concludes the evidence session. I ask members to be back at 11 o’clock for the next evidence session. I suspend the meeting until then.
10:51 Meeting suspended.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Thank you. We move on to Calum MacLeod.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Edward Mountain
I was just looking at that. This is how it will work. When I ask a question, if either of you looks away, I will probably come to you first. Neither of you did, so Malcolm, you can go first, followed by Calum.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Edward Mountain
I call Calum MacLeod. [Interruption.] I do not know whether the system is confusing. I think that everything is done for you, and you just have to sit there and start speaking—I hope, if broadcasting has got it right—so fire away.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Edward Mountain
I thank Mark Ruskell for stopping that line of thought before he trod on somebody else’s toes.
Monica Lennon has the next questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Okay. So it is about keeping it simple.
Deputy convener, over to you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Hold on, Monica—we lost your sound. We heard you say, “In your written evidence”. If you would like to, you can continue your train of thought from there.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Edward Mountain
I know that Kevin Stewart wants to come in, but before we move on, I will add that, in many cases, land management plans will be based on the principle of people running a business—they will have developed a land management plan to dovetail into their business and meet with the community needs where possible.
If my business was farming, for example—I have already declared that I am a farmer—my land management plan, if I were required to do it, would be about farming. If I sold the land, somebody might buy it to plant trees to meet the Government’s objective to plant trees, which might not meet the community’s need. By making a land management plan enforceable for a period of time, will you distort the land value? If so, how will you compensate it? I am saying that as a surveyor as well.
11:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Edward Mountain
We will get into non-compliance later, but I can see that interfering with the land market will come at some cost, and I am trying to figure out that cost.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Edward Mountain
I have a few quickfire questions to end with. Mark Ruskell said that a £5,000 fine did not seem very much, but I think that it might be a huge amount to very small farmers and landowners. Is there an argument for scaling the fine against the assets held and the size of the management plan? I am just thinking of ways around that, because £5,000 is going to be a massive amount of money to small-scale landowners, though not to some of the bigger investment companies. Would you go for scaling—yes or no?