The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5978 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
Amendment 60, in the name of Patrick Harvie, is grouped with amendments 61 and 63.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
That did not provoke a response.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
A couple of members have referred to speaking briefly in the interests of time, but we must give the bill proper consideration, so I am not trying to stop members debating it. I would just like to have that on the record. This is a valuable opportunity for the committee to consider the bill at stage 2, so if any member wants to make an intervention, they should not feel restricted by time. If we get to the stage where we are restricted by time, trust me—I will let you know. At the moment, however, we are not there.
With regard to the various amendments in Brian Whittle’s name that have been discussed so far, unfortunately, due to a clash with another committee that he sits on, he is unable to be at this meeting, which I know that he regrets. He has asked Douglas Lumsden to speak to his amendments, so I call Douglas to speak to amendment 46 and other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 5 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 4, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 59 disagreed to.
Amendment 9 not moved.
Amendment 54 moved—[Monica Lennon].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
Thank you. I call Douglas Lumsden—I think that I have got it right this time—to wind up.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
I wondered whether that was just hesitation but, obviously, it was not.
I call Patrick Harvie to wind up and to press or withdraw amendment 27.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Abstentions
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
The question is that amendment 61 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.