The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6264 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Edward Mountain
As you said, the committee has shown a willingness to consider the regulations at pace and to get that done as quickly as possible so that there will be no delay in the delivery of the climate change plan. I reiterate that what concerns me is the public consultation. The public may have very strong views on the draft plan—I hope that they do; I hope that they respond in numbers to show that they buy into what is suggested—and it might need to be adapted before it comes before the Parliament.
I have grave concerns about the timescale, which I have now put on the record. I see that Mark Ruskell wants to come in on that issue.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Edward Mountain
I did not say this at the beginning, so I will say it now. There are a huge number of questions to get through and, in the previous evidence session, committee members were extremely good at making their questions succinct. I am not saying that your answers have not been succinct, cabinet secretary, but I encourage everyone to keep to short questions and short answers.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Edward Mountain
Sorry, cabinet secretary, but is that letter published, or is it a private letter?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Edward Mountain
I agree that there is no point in pointing out problems and not bringing solutions. It is always a question of whether the solutions are workable, and that will be for others to decide. Are the problems in the letter the only ones that you see? Is everything else tickety-boo and online, as far as reserved matters are concerned? Is there nothing else to worry about with regard to Scotland reaching net zero by 2045? Is that what you are saying?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Edward Mountain
That is twice. We do not need to do it a third time.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Edward Mountain
Okay. We will have a short question from the deputy convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Edward Mountain
Mark Ruskell has some questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Edward Mountain
I am going to be the bad guy now. We have six questions and we are going to get through them. The deputy convener has the next batch. I will cut you short, cabinet secretary, if I think that you are overexpanding on your answers.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Edward Mountain
Rest assured that I, along with many other people, will be looking for the exact costings.
That brings our evidence session to a halt. I will briefly suspend the meeting until 12:25 before we go into the final item, which is a vote on the motion.
12:17 Meeting suspended.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Edward Mountain
I will say a little bit and I will then bring in the cabinet secretary. The evidence that we have heard has been particularly interesting. At the moment, I do not know in my mind—and as a parliamentarian, as the deputy convener said—whether we need to weaken or strengthen the commitments that the cabinet secretary will be making, because we have not seen the climate change plan that will be produced.
There is an issue in my mind about developing our understanding of what is achievable, which is not only about the commitment of individuals or of Government but is about the cost of that and how we will achieve it. I take the point on the importance of electrification, but during the process of hearing about it, especially today, I have found it very difficult to stomach simply saying that the cost of doing nothing is too high. To my mind, that is lazy and slightly rude to the individuals who are trying to question it.
With the way that the vote will go today, carbon budgets will probably go through. I may be proved wrong—[Interruption.] I will finish on this point. They will probably go through, but I want to register my dissatisfaction with the whole process of how that has come about. The committee should have been discussing the matter much earlier. I have always made it clear—people who have spoken to me will support me on this—that I do not like and have never liked the fact that we are doing this in the last months of the parliamentary session. It is far too important a matter for us to get it wrong. When it comes to the vote, I will abstain, not because I want to frustrate the budgets, but because I want to register my dissatisfaction at how the process has gone.
Cabinet secretary, I give you the opportunity to sum up if you wish.