The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5978 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Before we go to a break, I have a question. I got the impression that £5,000 was considered to be a good starting point for a potential fine. What would happen if the plan was not produced three months later and there was no reason for it not to be? Do you think that there should be a graduated fine? Would that help the legislation to achieve what is intended? Would that make it clear to people that they cannot just deal with a £5,000 fine because it is cheaper than spending the £15,000 that would be required to produce a plan? I do not know; it is just a question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
I almost caught you nodding there, Gemma Cooper. Do you agree?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
My next question was going to be whether only large landowners should be prevented from performing the role or whether all landowners should be prevented from doing so. Can you see why the definition of a large landowner has been used, or do you think that that approach is based on a perception? Should we simply look for the best person to do the job?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
That brings us to the end of the session. As we will continue to look at land reform for some time yet, if you would like to follow up on anything that you have said, or if there is anything that you missed, you can get in touch with the committee clerks and let them know.
Thank you for attending this morning’s meeting. There was one member who might have been joining us, but they have not done so. That brings us to the end of the public part of the meeting, and we now move into private.
12:12 Meeting continued in private until 12:37.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Mark Ruskell wants to come back in.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
The second item is consideration of a draft statutory instrument. The Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) (No 2) Order 2024 makes various changes to the United Kingdom emissions trading scheme. In its report, the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee made no comment on the instrument.
I welcome Gillian Martin, the Acting Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero and Energy. I also welcome the Scottish Government officials who are joining us for this item: Mariana Cover, senior policy adviser; and Nanjika Nasiiro, head of just transition policy.
The instrument is laid under the affirmative procedure, which means that it cannot come into force unless the Parliament approves it. Following this evidence session, the committee will be invited to consider a motion to recommend that the instrument be approved. As always, I remind everyone that Scottish Government officials can talk under this item, but not in the debate that follows. I ask the cabinet secretary to make a short opening statement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
I listened with interest to that exchange about carbon taxes being used to fund net zero. It would be remiss of me not to say that ScotWind was to do that as well, but does not appear to have been used for that either.
You commented that very little venting is going on in Scotland. What are you talking about? Can you quantify what “very little” means? How many companies?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
I am sorry to interrupt, cabinet secretary, but, just to help you, I will say that the committee’s papers stated that the ETS impact assessment, which is for the UK, estimated that the scheme would probably cost business £2.4 billion, and that assumes that the carbon capture, usage and storage scheme and hydrogen go ahead as planned. Have you made an assessment of what it will cost businesses in Scotland if those developments are not delivered as planned? I am sorry if I explained that badly.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
You will be pleased to hear that we now come to the final questions, which are on the land and communities commissioner. It seems that he or she will be given a specific role—a role as distinct as that of the tenant farming commissioner—in the Land Commission. Is that a good idea?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Absolutely, but can I ask that it be slightly shorter? There was quite a lot of statement in the previous question, if I might be so bold as to say.