The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5978 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
As there do not appear to be any further questions, we move to agenda item 3, which is the debate on motion S6M-14755. No, it is not—I am sorry. Yes, it is. I am sorry—I almost confused myself, but I was not confused. Agenda item 3 is the debate on motion S6M-14755, which calls on the committee to recommend approval of the draft order.
Cabinet secretary, I invite you to move and speak to the motion.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
I see that no member wishes to make a contribution. On that basis, I am not entirely convinced that you will need to sum up, cabinet secretary, but, if you want to, I have to give you the opportunity.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Agenda item 4 is an evidence-taking session on the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill at stage 1. Today, the committee will hear from a panel representing landowners and land managers, with the focus on part 1 of the bill.
Malcolm Mathieson, convener of the Crofting Commission, was going to be here, too, but unfortunately he is unable to attend today, for very understandable reasons. We will try to work his attendance into another meeting.
I am pleased to welcome Sarah-Jane Laing, chief executive of Scottish Land & Estates; David Bean, Parliament and Government relations manager at the Countryside Alliance; and Gemma Cooper, head of policy at NFU Scotland.
As usual, I will declare my interests. I am a member of a family farming partnership in Moray, as set out in my entry in the register of members’ interests. I specifically declare an interest as owner of approximately 500 acres of farmland, of which about 50 acres is woodland. I am also a tenant of approximately 500 acres in Moray under a non-agricultural tenancy, which is an interesting permutation, and I have another farming tenancy under the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991. I sometimes take lets for grass on a short-term basis.
We have allowed just under two hours for this item, and we will move straight to questions. As convener, I will begin with some simple ones, which I will give all three of you a chance to answer. Is there a need for a further land reform bill? Will the bill improve transparency and strengthen the rights of communities? Does it reflect all the negotiations that took place before its introduction?
Who wants to kick off? I should say that if you all look away at the same time when I ask who wants to answer a question, I will pick the person who is the slowest to do so, so you will need to be really quick. [Laughter.] Sarah-Jane, as you did not look away, you will be first to go.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Just before we leave this subject, I note what Sarah-Jane Laing mentioned about crofting and the implications of the measures.
I am not clever enough to work out the legislation. If somebody wanted to decroft his or her croft, that would possibly count in the same way as a sale from an estate because a statutory sum would need to be paid. Similarly, an apportionment of common grazings, which we all know is just a dot on a map to represent somebody’s share, could trigger the section in question. When it comes to crofting—and it is sad that we do not have a crofting representative on the panel, although I hope that we will have one in the future—I am not sure whether a croft transfer from one member of the family to another would trigger that section. Do you have any views on that point or any concerns that those situations might trigger that section? Should we be looking at that?
11:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
I will bring in Gemma Cooper and then come to Kevin Stewart, who has a question. However, I should say that, if that question is about community engagement, the issue is going to be addressed later by another member.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Okay. It sort of links into the earlier question around how you can draw up a management plan for a crofting estate if you have no control of the crofting or what the crofters do, except to say, “I want it to be a crofting estate,” which is what will happen anyway. I am not sure. It is complex. Gemma, NFUS looks at some crofting issues. Do you have a view on that point?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Who would be responsible for the arbitration of community engagement? Would that sit with the Land Commission as a whole?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Thank you. I thought that I was going to ask that question, but there you go.
Monica, you have the next question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Gemma, would you support the point about connectedness?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Edward Mountain
There could be upland farmers, for example, who are doing one thing on that land and then have different land that they move the cattle or sheep to, which might have a completely different management—