Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 20 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 7218 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

NatureScot (Annual Report and Accounts and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Edward Mountain

I have some quickfire questions for you, Nick.

The Scottish outdoor access code, which Mark Ruskell referred to, is just over 20 years old. It is probably time for a review—nothing lasts for 20 years without needing some review. We have seen less money going into rangers, core paths and footpaths from local councils, and collapsing local access forums. How can you say that it is not time to review it, and that that is not one of your priorities?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

NatureScot (Annual Report and Accounts and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Edward Mountain

I would not disagree with that, but to keep it relevant, you have to keep reviewing it.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

NatureScot (Annual Report and Accounts and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Edward Mountain

I will let Mark Ruskell and Douglas Lumsden ask a couple of brief questions, and then I will ask some questions at the end.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

NatureScot (Annual Report and Accounts and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Edward Mountain

There is some concern that money is being invested to build portfolios to be released into the carbon credit market when it actually matures.

I turn to your report, which says that you have 12 board members and that you extended the service period for seven members whose first term ended on 31March 2025. They are supposed to serve a four-year term but appear still to be in place. Can you confirm that none of them will serve more than the eight years that the legislation entitles them to?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

NatureScot (Annual Report and Accounts and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Edward Mountain

That did not answer the question. I am asking whether your pay is within the range of £115,000 to £120,000.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Edward Mountain

Bob Doris and Douglas Lumsden have follow-up questions.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Edward Mountain

Members have lots of other questions. I will come to Mark Ruskell next.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Edward Mountain

That might be something for the next Government and the next minister to look at.

We move to The National Bus Travel Concession Schemes (Miscellaneous Amendment) (Scotland) Order 2026, which relates to the code of conduct. Minister, do you want to make a brief opening statement?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Edward Mountain

You will get a chance to move the motion under the next item, so that is fine.

I am looking round committee members to see whether anyone wants to ask questions on the draft order.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Edward Mountain

I am just looking around the room—I see no other member wanting to comment. I will comment and then go to the minister. I say at the start that I will not take any interventions.

I have been a convener in the Parliament for nine years and I have sat through the consideration of numerous SSIs during that time. I have been supportive of a lot of them, and I have not been supportive of some of them. In those nine years, there is only one SSI that has come back after it was rejected, with the motion not moved the first time because it was quite clear that the policy behind it was immature and not properly thought out. It has happened only one time—with this order.

We waited and were told that a draft code of conduct would come to the committee. The draft code of conduct was submitted with a letter from the minister. I have to say that the draft code of conduct, as produced to this committee, is poor in content and unhelpful in a lot of respects, because it raises more questions than it answers. I was extremely grateful for the input of the deputy convener and Kevin Stewart in explaining to the committee some of the things that the minister was unable to explain.

I want the order to be approved, and I will vote for the motion on the basis that I agree with the principle of the order. Do I think that it is ready to be implemented? No, I do not. If the order is approved, it must be implemented by 24 March. That allows the Government 28 working days to come up with a code of conduct that works well and is able to support the order. Do I believe that that can happen? No, I do not.

I have to say—and it is really sad that I have to say this—that in my time in the Parliament, the consideration of this order has proved to be the most difficult thing to convene, and it has perhaps shown the Parliament at its worst when it comes to dealing with SSIs. Those are strong words, and I do not say them lightly.

Minister, I will come to you now, if you would like to comment.