The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7219 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 433 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Welcome back. We expect this session to continue until around 1.30, but that will depend on how quickly we go. I am not saying that the cabinet secretary ought to cut down her speaking notes—that is up to her—but we have quite a way to go if we are to get to where I want us to be before we finish for today and start again tomorrow night.
The next group is on information about land. Amendment 375, in the name of Mark Ruskell, is grouped with amendments 376 to 378, 470, 475 and 477.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you, cabinet secretary. I now ask Tim Eagle to wind up and to press or withdraw amendment 450.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 460 disagreed to.
Amendments 461 and 462 not moved.
Amendment 175 moved—[Mairi Gougeon]—and agreed to.
Amendment 176 not moved.
Section 5, as amended, agreed to.
Section 6—Establishment of the land and communities commissioner
Amendment 463 moved—[Tim Eagle].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The next group is on reviews and so on in relation to the act. Amendment 182, in the name of Bob Doris, is grouped with amendments 367, 383 to 385, 503 and 386 to 388. I call Bob Doris to speak to amendment 182 and other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Cabinet secretary, it comes to you to speak to amendment 154 and any of the other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I call Mark Ruskell to speak to Ariane Burgess’s amendment 367 and other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you. Is that you finished, Mercedes?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Before we go to the cabinet secretary, I would like to make a comment on amendment 383, which was lodged by Martin Whitfield. I have long believed that this Parliament is extremely bad at doing post-legislative scrutiny—that is a matter that has constantly vexed the Conveners Group. Martin Whitfield brought up the Salvesen v Riddell case. Had post-legislative scrutiny been carried out, that would have saved a huge amount of money, not only for the families but for the Government.
I would be very surprised if the cabinet secretary does not support amendment 383, because it would enable the Parliament to undertake greater scrutiny to ensure that we had not adversely affected the tenant farming sector through the legislation. For example, one of the points that people who gave evidence to the committee strongly made was that altering some of the resumption provisions could have an adverse effect on the tenant farming sector.
We are clear that the previous legislation has affected the tenant farming sector, but we have done nothing about it. I am looking forward to the cabinet secretary supporting Martin Whitfield’s amendment 383 or giving very good reasons as to why she does not.