The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6348 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Edward Mountain
In fairness, this is a relaying of the original instrument and we had some indication of those matters during the previous briefing. It might have been helpful if that had been reiterated, but it was done in the first instance, although something might have been lost in translation.
As no other member wishes to comment, I invite the committee to agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the instrument.
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Edward Mountain
Was any comment made about the quality of the bus stops in rural areas? Some of them seem to face into the prevailing wind and rain. That does not work for me, but I wonder whether you have any comments on that.
09:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you. The next questions come from Mark Ruskell.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Edward Mountain
Accepting that not everything is always perfect, holding up your hands and going back to the customer to try to resolve the problem after it has occurred is, perhaps, a solution.
I turn to the Water Industry Commission for Scotland—not an organisation that is without its past problems. It has said that there is a deficit of £500 million for investment because of Scottish Water’s below-inflation charging decisions—that means that we have lost out on that investment. How will you make up that shortfall? Should customers expect their bills to rise consistently to replace the shortfall that has occurred in the past?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Edward Mountain
The commission could set a higher cap, in recognition of the fact that you have underinvested, as it were, because of the decision. The temptation would therefore be for you to increase charges if a sudden shortfall was identified or a major investment was suddenly required in a year.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Edward Mountain
I am not sure whether that is, in the nicest possible way, a little flag to householders in Scotland that prices are going to go up and probably go up considerably. That is what you are saying, is it not?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Edward Mountain
There is evidence of other people getting that salary. For example, when Tim Hair was at Ferguson Marine, all his accommodation costs were paid.
I bring in Mark Ruskell, followed by Bob Doris.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Edward Mountain
Yes—we cannot go down any more rabbit holes.
Mark Ruskell has a question before the deputy convener asks a series of questions on water quality.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Edward Mountain
Congratulations, Mark, the prize is yours. [Laughter.]
I think that we have gone through all the questions. I have a simple final question. Alex Plant, before you started working for Scottish Water in 2022, I submitted a freedom of information request about the water mains across Scotland. At that stage, I think that there were about 50,000km of water mains around Scotland—I have rounded the figures up, if you will excuse me—and Scottish Water estimated that about 12 per cent of its pipes were manufactured using asbestos, which meant that there were about 6,000 km of small-diameter asbestos pipes. You were allowing £40 million a year to replace them. With that investment, we would eventually be rid of asbestos in our water pipes by 2072. Are you still investing at that rate, or are you speeding up the process? Should the public expect you to be speeding it up?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Edward Mountain
The good news is that I will not be around then to ask you questions. Do you not think that people in Scotland would expect you to be replacing them faster than that? I have worked with those pipes and understand them, but I am gravely concerned that the pipes could be fracturing and coming to the end of their life, because, in my opinion, that is when they would become the most dangerous. If a pipe fractures, it dries and bits drop off, and it becomes very difficult for you to clear that out of the system. I am asking you to reflect on that and to say a little to the public about why you want that programme of work to be accelerated. In my opinion, it is not enough to bring it forward by 15 years—that would mean that the work would be completed be by 2050. Should it not be done by 2030?