The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5973 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
The responses from people regarding whether that was a good or a bad idea were a bit more nuanced. Would it have been helpful to have a lease-forming part of the bill rather than introducing it through secondary legislation?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
I am trying to find out whether there is a view; you say that you are using a different word with the same effect, which creates confusion.
I have a further question on diversification and how rent reviews take place. Farms, whether they are owner occupied or tenanted, have to look at all the options to make ends meet, because things are different. Ten years ago, a farm probably needed two farm labourers to do what one labourer can do now, because of machinery. That might throw up the issue of diversifying the use of a house, or a house might no longer be required. The bill does not cover that at all. Is that a mistake?
As Fiona Leslie said, farming is changing so quickly, so should we consider that the resources that are needed for farming should be changed? Should that be taken into account when setting rent to allow the landlord and the tenant—or the occupier and owner, if they are the same person—to make the best use of a property?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
Cabinet secretary, I am sure that you would like to answer that question, but I know that parliamentarians have very strong views about introducing at stage 2 things that have not been consulted on at stage 1.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
I might find myself in complete disagreement with a fellow committee member, but I ask you to bear that in mind.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
I listened carefully, cabinet secretary.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
As no other member has any comments, I will move to the substantive question. Is the committee content that the provisions set out in the notification should be made in the proposed UK statutory instrument, subject to writing to the Scottish Government at the same time to say that we are concerned about why the process has proceeded in this way?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
Okay. Cabinet secretary, you will be pleased to know that I am not going to be allowed by the rest of the committee to ask all my other technical questions, so I will submit them in writing.
We will turn to questions from Mark Ruskell.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you. We will consider the recommendation that we will make to the Parliament as a result of this discussion, later in the meeting. The clerks will be in touch with you. Thank you for your time this morning and for waiting patiently when I let the earlier part of the meeting run over time.
We will move on because we are quite pushed for time.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
The next item of business is the consideration of a type 1 consent notification relating to a proposed statutory instrument, the Persistent Organic Pollutants (Amendment) (No 2) Regulations 2025.
On 22 January, the Scottish Government notified us of this proposed UK statutory instrument. It would involve the UK Government legislating in devolved competence and it is seeking the Scottish Government’s consent to do so.
The Scottish Government proposes to give its consent and our role is to decide whether we agree to its doing that. That involves determining whether we agree to the UK Government legislating in this particular devolved area and whether we are content with the manner in which the UK Government proposes to legislate. If we are content for consent to be given, we will write to the Scottish Government saying so. In doing so, we have the option to draw the Scottish Government’s attention to matters or to pose questions. There were some suggestions in the clerks’ papers for things that we could consider.
Do any members have views on the statutory instrument?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
Things are seldom ideal. I understand your concerns and we can certainly include them in our letter to the Scottish Government. Are you content to agree to the instrument, having drawn the Government’s attention to that point? What is your position?