The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6348 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
No. We will come to your amendments in a moment. There are other members before you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you, cabinet secretary.
Although Mark Ruskell moved Ariane Burgess’s amendment 310, Ariane has now finished with her other committee business and is here. We have agreed that Mark Ruskell will sum up the debate and press or seek to withdraw amendment 310, but please do not take it as a slight that I am ignoring you, Ariane—I know that you are here.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you, Douglas. As no other member wishes to say anything, I wish to talk about amendments 310, 339, 150 and 174, which relate to public interest.
I understand the need to address public interest, and I have heard what has been said about it during the course of this stage 2 debate. My concern is that a certain amount of conflict would be created by the list of things in subsection (2) of the proposed new provision that amendment 310 would introduce. When you draw up a management plan as the owner of land, you cannot keep everyone happy—that is for sure—and you cannot afford to do everything that everyone wants to do. There is no definition or clarity in any of these amendments about public interest in relation to who is going to pay the person who delivers the public interest and whether, in fact, that person should be rewarded for that.
At the moment, the system pays agricultural subsidies for achieving various aims. I put my hand up and say that I am in receipt of agricultural subsidies for delivering public good in relation to the production of food.
Proposed new subsection (2)(k), as set out in amendment 310, is about contributing to food security and food system resilience. Another paragraph in proposed subsection (2) relates to a requirement for diversity. The problem is that, sometimes, intensive grazing of land to create food security is the best way forward but it might not be in the Government’s interest. At the moment, the Government is struggling to come to terms with the advice of the Climate Change Committee on whether to reduce livestock numbers across Scotland by 30 per cent. That might destroy farms and farmers who would not be able to achieve the scale needed to carry out their business. I am concerned, and I do not think that any of the tests that have been put forward under amendments 310, 339, 150 or 174 define how public interest and its delivery will be rewarded.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Sorry, Mercedes, but can I just come in here? It is always very difficult at stage 2 to make sure that there is an open debate, but it does not need to be a conversation across the table. I am gently pointing you to ask a question, which might be followed up by another question, through me, and then you can address the issues when you get to speak. Otherwise, I fear that we could be here until Christmas, which might be a good thing, but maybe not.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I call Ariane Burgess to speak to amendment 3 and other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I call Mercedes Villalba to speak to amendment 43 and other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I call Douglas Lumsden to speak to his amendment 343. You do not have to repeat everything that you said when you spoke on behalf of Rachael Hamilton, Mr Lumsden, however tempting that might be.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Mr Lumsden, I let you get that word in twice, but I will not let you get it in again. You can refer to the farm tax in relation to this bill. I am very proud of the fact that committees of this Parliament are apolitical. You can express your views about the tax, but not in that way.
I call Mark Ruskell to speak to amendment 49A and other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
We are at a difficult point in the stage 2 proceedings, because we are about to go into another group, which will require debate and a series of votes. That would take us well beyond the time that I have allowed for our meeting this morning, so I propose that we hold it there. We have not got as far as we hoped, and we will have to work out what we are going to do as regards continuing our stage 2 consideration of the bill. We have that to look forward to. Cabinet secretary, we will be in contact with you once we have discussed our work programme.
I close the public part of the meeting.
12:17 Meeting continued in private until 12:53.