The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6874 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Edward Mountain
Our decision on the instrument has to be made by 10 February, so we could do that next week. I have made the offer, cabinet secretary, and you have made your decision. That is fine.
Motion moved,
That the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee recommends that the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) Order 2026 [draft] be approved.—[Gillian Martin]
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Edward Mountain
Matthew, is it a good plan or a great plan? What is missing?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Edward Mountain
That a 20-year payback period might be acceptable for you—he says, tongue in cheek—but I fear that I will be long gone by then. I might be a pessimist, but I am going on the statistics for life expectancy.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Edward Mountain
Well, it will come as a surprise to you, Gemma.
This question is for all the witnesses. Let us go to page 51 of annex 3 of the climate change plan, which is the summary of the costs and benefits under the plan. In it, the Government says that there are
“no … costs to government from energy supply policies”.
It will all be driven by the market, but “significant investment” will be needed. It says that there will be no benefits and no cost to Scotland from what will happen on energy supply—it is the only section of the plan in which that is the case, I think.
Based on what Matthew Hannon said, one of my concerns is that, for people to buy into the plan, they need to understand what it will cost them. As householders, Claire, what will it cost us if we buy into the plan? There are no costs and no benefits to the Government. Some of the benefits that the Government has given in other sections include benefits to the national health service from reduced treatment and so on, but, apparently, there are not even any of those benefits in this section. What are the costs?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Edward Mountain
Gemma Grimes, you get a chance to speak now—not to agree with the point that Michael Matheson made that it might be good news that I will not be around in 20 years, but on the costs.
10:00
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Edward Mountain
Okay. I have no idea about the costs of solar—I am sure that we will find out about them shortly.
Sarah, do you want to ask a brief question before I move to Kevin Stewart?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Edward Mountain
Kevin, I think that you have some questions that you would like to ask.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Edward Mountain
We are only at the end of question 2 and there are 20 questions. We are about 40 minutes into the session, so it could be a long one. I hate cutting people off and I hate telling them that time is short. I am not going to cut him off, but I will tell him that time is short. Mark Ruskell, the next questions lie with you.
10:30
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Edward Mountain
Perfect.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Edward Mountain
I have a specific question for Claire Mack about a comment that she made. Everyone probably agrees that, if we are to get the public to sign up to the plan, they need to be invested in it, and we need to move at pace, as Matthew Hannon said, because there is no time to spare.
We talked briefly about the ECU. In previous days, you were able to submit an objection to the ECU by email, but the information was never published because there was never time to publish it, so members of the public never knew whether their views had been taken into account. We now have an online portal, and I am never quite sure whether the information on it will be published. The timescales for objecting to consents are particularly short, which affects people who want to object, because they might not have time to look at the massive documents that are submitted in support of some projects. Do you reckon that that is fair for the people who have to put up with the infrastructure?