The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6299 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I am not disputing that. What I am trying to work out is this. We were very much told that the heads of terms had been agreed. Having done purchases of land in my previous profession, I know that it can be done quite quickly. I am not asking what the price is, but if this were to be agreed today, would you have the money to buy it tomorrow? Could it be transferred that quickly? That is normally the way it works.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I would accept short, medium and long-term plans for capital investments, but you will still have a base price for each of those aspects at the time that you put forward the business case, and that will be based on today’s figure, with a potential inflationary rise over a few years. That is the way that it would be done commercially, so I would be very grateful if you could provide that information.
Douglas Lumsden has some questions, and then I will bring in the deputy convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I am delighted that these regulations are being brought forward. I remember that it was an issue that we wrestled with many years ago, when I was a member of this committee, and I think that this is the right move.
With regard to how you have sorted out the finance, why did you decide that the split would be that the council salary would still be paid by, presumably, the council and that only the adjusted MSP salary would be be paid by the Parliament? Surely the councils are the ones that are short of money and the one that could bear the cost is the Scottish Parliament.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
My question is more on the mechanics of it, convener. I do not know the answer to this, but, if someone is an MP and then gets elected as an MSP, I presume that they will go straight on to being able to employ staff as an MSP, who might also be the staff they are employing as an MP. Have you considered that? Will guidance on that be issued between the two Parliaments? There could be a period in which the MSP and MP are employing the same staff. You are solving one issue, minister, but have you thought about solving the other? Or does it not happen? I do not know the answer to that, but I am sure that you will have looked at it.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
IPSA is confident, and you are confident.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
Okay. Thank you very much, convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
Having raised that point, I think that it is important to pursue it. A bit of research that I have done suggests that sums of up to £20,000 in relation to admin appointments could be paid on top of a councillor’s salary. It is difficult, because there are exceptions, and I know that the minister has alluded to that. Additional pay and grading might be disallowed in some council areas but encouraged in other areas. I encourage monitoring of that to make sure, and I ask for a clear comment that it would not be expected that people who are getting that additional money would take it on top of their salary. I would be grateful if the minister could say that that is his understanding—unless perhaps it is not.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I believe that, in some councils, people in senior administration roles or roles with additional responsibilities receive allowances on top of their council salary. Therefore, why have you deducted only the basic rate, given that they could be getting the basic rate-plus?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
From that point of view, it is the easier route. I can understand that, because it is easy to administer. However, minister, is it possible to put on the record the fact that, if somebody was getting additional pay on top of their councillor pay, you would not expect them to draw it, because it would make them better off than an MSP or just a normal councillor who had become a member of the Parliament?
09:45Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I have probably explored that matter as far as I can. However, I would just comment that the way that the salaries have been dealt with—deducted at source—is a much more comfortable position than allowing people to choose charities. Sometimes, that can be difficult to administer, and the individual might have links with those charities, which could create problems. Therefore, deducting the salary at source is the right way to do it and a huge step in the right direction.