The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5973 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
It kind of answers the question, but once the electricity is put into the national grid, there will be a national pricing structure for it, even if it goes to an electrolyser. There is something that I am trying to work out. If it will cost, say, £1 to achieve X with electricity, how much will it cost to achieve X with hydrogen? What is the difference? How much more will have to be paid for hydrogen? I am told that more will have to be paid for hydrogen than for electricity.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
I understand that it will be the same amount of energy, but I am a simple soul and I am trying to understand. You said that hydrogen is more slippery. If it is more slippery, that suggests to me that it moves at a quicker pace.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
I have a question on that specific point. It is my understanding that, compared with natural gas, it is possible to move a lot more hydrogen in a smaller pipe. Is that right?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Welcome back. We will now hear from our second panel of witnesses on the hydrogen aspects of the project willow study. Joining us in the room is Dr Simon Gill, independent energy consultant and author of “Green hydrogen in Scotland: A report for Scottish Futures Trust”. Appearing remotely are Dr Jan Rosenow, energy programme leader and Jackson senior research fellow at Oriel College, University of Oxford, and Professor Mark Symes, professor of electrochemistry and electrochemical technology at the school of chemistry, University of Glasgow. I welcome you all. Somewhat bizarrely, Simon, the fact that our online witness appear on a screen below you, which is facing me, makes it look as though you are flanked by them.
If you were listening to the first part of the meeting, you will have heard me say to the first panel of witnesses that my first question is the easy one. Project willow did not advocate for the use of either green or blue hydrogen but said only that a “reliable source” of low-carbon hydrogen will be required. Which source do you think is most likely to offer Scotland a reliable and affordable supply of hydrogen? I put that question to Mark first, before coming to Simon Gill and Jan Rosenow.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
I am looking at those online now. Does anyone want to come back on that before I move to Kevin Stewart?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
No—I am impressed. You were quicker to respond than our witnesses who are online.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Thanks, Kevin. The next questions come from Douglas.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
We will write to the Scottish Government on that basis. We will also ask the Government to tell us the timescale on which it proposes to ban the chemicals.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you. We will write to the Scottish Government to that effect.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
The next item of business is consideration of petition PE2123. The petition, which has been lodged by Asthma and Lung UK Scotland, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to amend the Air Quality Standards (Scotland) Regulations 2010 by setting new limit values for nitrogen dioxide and fine particulate matter in order to align with the World Health Organization’s 2021 air quality guidelines.
The committee first considered the petition in April, when it agreed to write to the Scottish Government to get an update on its review of its strategy, “Cleaner Air for Scotland 2: Towards a Better Place for Everyone”. The Scottish Government responded on 22 April, and its letter is provided in annex B of the relevant paper, which also sets out some options for going further.
Do members have any views?