The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5973 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Douglas, can I make the suggestion? That might be outwith the technical competence of the panel of witnesses, which I am sure is very varied. We ought to write to SGN and find out how easy it would be to transport hydrogen. Would it use steel pipelines like the one that runs from Aberdeen to Inverness—I know about that because it comes through the farm—or would it use plastic ones?
We should ask it that, because it is clear that, if we move to hydrogen, we will have to transport it. It would be useful to know how easy it would be to do that. Are you happy with that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
I do not know why I got that wrong—Statera Energy Ltd. I also welcome: Bill Ireland, the chief executive officer for Logan Energy Ltd; Mark Bradley, the hydrogen director in Scottish Power; David Amos, the managing director of PlusZero; and Tim Dumenil, the head of business development for Storegga, who is attending remotely.
At the outset, I refer members to my register of interests, which declares that I am a proprietor of salmon fishings on the River Spey and am a member of the Spey Fishery Board. The board, which is a statutory body, has recently considered a planning application for a hydrogen plant at Marypark, which was submitted by Storegga. As the plant would take water out of the River Spey, the board had to consider the options and its responsibilities regarding protecting the fisheries management of the catchment, and, on that basis, has objected to the application on the ground that it would take water out of the river, which the board feels is inappropriate. I hope that that is a full declaration.
I am going to go straight to questions. The first question is always an easy one—I like to think so, anyway—as it involves asking witnesses for their views on how things are working at the moment. You will each get a chance to answer it, starting with Bill Ireland—I am giving you plenty of warning that I am coming to you.
Project willow does not advocate the use of green or blue hydrogen, and the UK and Scottish Governments have said that it needs a twin-track approach. Do you think that that approach is correct or do you think that more attention should be paid to green or blue hydrogen?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
I think that Douglas Lumsden has the next questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Sorry—do you want to come in, Mark?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
It is probably fair to say that people find it particularly difficult to stomach when, if there is too much electricity so power cannot be generated, constraint payments are given to people with wind farms. That power could perhaps be diverted not to massive battery storage sites but to hydrogen sites or wherever we wanted it to go.
Tim Dumenil wants to come in.
09:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
The deputy convener wants in with a follow-up question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
I will be tight. To reiterate what the deputy convener said, he is asking for one option per panel member, and that is not one long list.
Why do we not start with Bill Ireland and work our way along?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
We will now hear from our second panel of witnesses on hydrogen aspects of the project willow study, with a focus on Grangemouth and its potential role in relation to blue hydrogen and the use of carbon capture and storage technology to decarbonise the industry.
I welcome to the meeting Professor Stuart Haszeldine, who is professor of carbon capture and storage in the University of Edinburgh’s school of geosciences—Stuart, thank you for submitting written evidence to us—Nic Braley, who is general manager of the Acorn project; Professor Hannah Chalmers, who is personal chair of sustainable energy systems in the institute for energy systems, which is part of the University of Edinburgh’s school of engineering; and Professor Mercedes Maroto-Valer, who is director of the Industrial Decarbonisation Research and Innovation Centre at Heriot-Watt University. Those are some of the longest descriptions that I have had to read out.
There are four of you on the panel. If you keep your answers short, each of you will get in. If your answers are too long, you will exclude your fellow panel members. Please bear that in mind. The first question is from Sarah Boyack.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
You are all very polite, which I love. Mercedes, if you comment first, I will then bring in Hannah.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Stuart, do you want to comment on sorting out the problems that are before us?