The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2633 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Douglas Ross
That is a long-term issue, and it is recognised. Are you saying that, if the four colleges that you identify are to survive past next summer, it will take cash injections from the Scottish Government to keep them afloat?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Douglas Ross
I understand that, and I understand that you give privileged information to ministers. Are you telling us that you know a figure, but you cannot tell the committee, or that the Scottish Funding Council does not know how much money Scottish colleges would need to get them over the very difficult period that will come by the end of the 2025-26 academic year, which is summer next year?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Douglas Ross
We move to our next agenda item. The committee will continue our evidence taking, which we began last week, on the Restraint and Seclusion in Schools (Scotland) Bill.
This is our third panel of witnesses today. Dr Lynne Binnie is service lead for inclusion at the City of Edinburgh Council and co-chair of the inclusion network at the Association of Directors of Education in Scotland; Tom Britton is Edinburgh local association assistant secretary at the Educational Institute of Scotland; Dr Pauline Stephen is chief executive and registrar at the General Teaching Council for Scotland; Mike Corbett is national official, Scotland, at the NASUWT; and Gavin Calder is chief executive officer of Harmeny school and a board member of the Scottish Council of Independent Schools.
I am very grateful to you all for bearing with us, as we have overrun today. I know that a couple of you have to be away by the designated time, so we will try to be direct with our questions. If you can be direct with your answers, we will get through as much as we can.
I will kick things off. It is fair to say that the two panels that we have already heard from on the bill were generally supportive of it. There is more concern among some of today’s witnesses, who will perhaps want to discuss some of their concerns.
I have raised this point before. As the father of two boys in mainstream education—one at nursery and one at school—I get a phone call as soon as anything happens, even if it is extremely minor. However, parents of children who have been restrained or secluded say that they do not get the same notification. Is that correct? If so, why?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Douglas Ross
Does anyone else want to question the evidence that we have heard? Dr Stephen and Mr Britton are saying that reporting should be, or is, happening, so why are we getting parents demanding legislative change because they feel that it is not happening at the moment? We have heard some harrowing examples in our evidence sessions and have seen examples in the written submissions. We were told last week that significant numbers of pupils have been restrained and secluded in their schools just since the start of this school term, but that not all of those incidents have been reported.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Douglas Ross
Ms Binnie, you know what came up in response to our call for written evidence and in the evidence that the committee has heard already. Has the Association of Directors of Education in Scotland looked into the issue? Can you tell us whether notification should be happening on the ground but is not? I find Mr Corbett’s example quite extreme and think that such a situation would be fairly rare, but we have been told of numerous occasions of children going home from school and being petrified to speak about what happened, with the parent not finding out what actually happened until days or weeks later, following demands. That cannot be acceptable.
12:30Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Douglas Ross
Are you confident that policies and instructions are being implemented by staff?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Douglas Ross
Mr Calder, is there anything to add from the perspective of independent schools?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Douglas Ross
So why not just leave the staff where they are at the moment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Douglas Ross
If the bill becomes law, modern apprenticeships—apprenticeships in general—will make up a fraction of what the SFC will do compared to what you will be doing with regard to colleges and universities, given the funding that you will control in relation to them.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Douglas Ross
Watching that, did it feel to you like there were good relationships between the two bodies?