The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2020 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
Does the cabinet secretary also accept that independence is crucial here and that the role of regulating exams must be carried out independently from qualifications Scotland and from Government if we are to get trust back, or does she believe that that role can be part of the new body, which would, we hope, simply perform better in that respect?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
You got there before anyone else said that, Mr Mason.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
There will be a division.
For
Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con)
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD)
Ross, Douglas (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Mason, John (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind)
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 264 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
Is it about your not being seen during the division on amendment 261?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
Yes, the chat is monitored, but as we are doing the divisions by hand and not electronically, we have to record not just the numbers but how each person votes. Therefore, the clerking team is making sure that the right votes are allocated to the respective voting members on the committee. Everyone has a role.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
That concludes this part of our consideration of the bill at stage 2. I thank the cabinet secretary and her supporting officials for their attendance.
I will suspend briefly to allow the cabinet secretary and her officials to leave, then the committee will consider our next agenda item in private. After that, I will suspend the meeting until 6.15 pm. At that point, the committee will reconvene in public to continue its consideration of the Education (Scotland) Bill at stage 2.
12:37 Meeting continued in private.Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
Amendment 280, in the name of Ross Greer, is grouped with amendments 282, 35 and 71.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division is: For 5, Against 5, Abstentions 0. As the outcome of the division on amendment 226 is tied, I will now use my casting vote as convener in order for the committee to reach a decision. I vote in favour of amendment 226. Amendment 226 is therefore agreed to on the casting vote of the convener.
Amendment 226 agreed to.
Amendment 227 not moved.
Amendment 50 moved—[Ross Greer].
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 50 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.