The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2303 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you. I call Bill Kidd.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Douglas Ross
I suppose that my specific question, though, is this: do they even know that this bill is going through Parliament at the moment? Are they up to date with and aware of it? Are they worried about it, or are they waiting to see how your negotiations and discussions and the debates in here conclude before they ring the alarm bells?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Douglas Ross
A letter of guidance is not absolute. There is always provision for exceptional circumstances, and we have just discussed examples of pretty exceptional circumstances.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Douglas Ross
I have a couple of final questions. Sir Paul Grice, you will have heard the concerns that have been raised in evidence that moving apprenticeships into the SFC will mean that they will be diluted and that, given all the issues in your sector, another university or universities might, at some point, seek additional financial support from the SFC, so money for apprenticeships could be siphoned off from achieving the principal aim of supporting universities and other institutions. Do you accept that? If so, what can be done to reassure those who are concerned about that? If universities seek additional support from the SFC in the future, should it look at its entire budget in order to provide support?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Douglas Ross
I will come back to a few of those points, but let us hear from the other witnesses.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Did you watch our evidence session last week?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Do you think that that is a deliberate move by the Government, or is it potentially an oversight? Your submission is quite scathing:
“The draft Bill proposals do not meaningfully build on existing good practice and would seem not to have been informed by a full range of available and relevant research evidence and performance data.”
You are basically saying that the Government did not do its homework before it came up with the proposals.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Forgive me, but how much less? What are we looking at?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Douglas Ross
What does that picture look like? Describe what it would have looked like five years ago compared to now, because of budget impacts.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Good morning, and welcome to the 16th meeting in 2025 of the Education, Children and Young People Committee. The main item on our agenda is continuation of evidence taking on the Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill at stage 1. I welcome the first of our two panels of witnesses: Jon Vincent, the principal of Glasgow Clyde College, who is representing Colleges Scotland; Sir Paul Grice, the interim convener of Universities Scotland; Andrew Ritchie, the lead officer for the Developing the Young Workforce programme at Aberdeenshire Council, who is representing the Association of Directors of Education in Scotland’s sub-group on foundation apprenticeships; and Sai Shraddha Suresh Viswanathan, the president of the National Union of Students Scotland. Thank you all for joining us.
I will kick off with the question that I have asked the two previous panels of witnesses. What is the problem that the bill is seeking to address and rectify, and is the bill the answer to that problem?