The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2020 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 129 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
I am grateful to Willie Rennie for his clarification about the change. I am glad to hear that it is not just me who has had an issue—not that I was worried about that. Today, my office told me that, for the third time, my meeting with the SQA has been cancelled. If other MSPs have had issues meeting the SQA, although that is not great, it is understandable. I think that most MSPs would welcome the opportunity to have a face-to-face meeting with the organisation.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The wording in the amendments is “Parliamentary corporation”—that is how the SPCB is described.
On Mr Adam’s first point about whether this is necessary, the arguments that he is making now—that there has been a change in the culture and leadership of the SQA, and that things will get better or that they are already good enough for change not to be needed—are the exact same arguments that were put to Ian Thow in 2013, 12 years ago. He was told, “You have an issue, but we think that things are efficient and effective.” Then there were the issues with higher history, and there were also issues with national 5 history this year, which might have elicited a complaint to be investigated if we had had the proposed independent regulator in place.
I accept and understand George Adam’s points. However, those points were also made some time ago. If the issues had been acted on then, there might have been an independent regulator in place that would have independently examined the higher history exam situation that happened last year.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
Oh, okay. In that case, I call Pam Duncan-Glancy to wind up, and to press or withdraw amendment 254.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
There will be a division. We can see you fine, Clare Haughey.
For
Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con)
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD)
Ross, Douglas (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Haughey, Clare (Rutherglen) (SNP)
Mason, John (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind)
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 272 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division is: For 5, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
As the outcome of the division on amendment 272 is tied, I will now use my casting vote as convener in order for the committee to reach a decision. I vote in favour of amendment 272.
Amendment 272 agreed to.
12:30Amendments 273 and 274 not moved.
Section 11, as amended, agreed to.
After section 11
Amendment 130 moved—[Miles Briggs].
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 130 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
There will be a division.
For
Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con)
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
Ross, Douglas (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Haughey, Clare (Rutherglen) (SNP)
Mason, John (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind)
Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD)
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 8, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 275 disagreed to.
Section 12—Reviewing and revising the charters
Amendment 276 moved—[Pam Duncan-Glancy].