The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1956 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
Amendment 297, which is in my name, is grouped with amendments 298 to 301. I thank the cabinet secretary and her officials for their time on Monday to discuss the amendments in this group. There have been a number of references to them, and they have so far been positive, which has encouraged me throughout the proceedings so far.
There is no doubt that my motivation behind the amendments was the situation around last year’s higher history exam. We will come on to that in a moment. In preparation for a number of our evidence sessions on last year’s higher history exam, I was alerted to a petition to the Parliament back in 2013. Petition PE1484, by Ian Thow, called for a number of things, including the setting up of an independent regulator to consider examinations in Scotland. When I was considering my amendments, I contacted the petitioner, and he was extremely encouraged that, despite his disappointment some 12 years ago, the idea was still on the Parliament’s radar and was going to be discussed and considered by the committee.
Not everything in the petition forms part of my amendments but, at its heart, my amendment 297 seeks to put in place an independent individual as a regulator to consider complaints about the exam process. I make the point about the petition back in 2013 because last year’s higher history was not a one-off event; there have been other events where parents, pupils and staff have raised concerns about SQA examinations and the SQA has looked into those itself. Indeed, when the petition was dismissed in November 2013, it was because the Scottish Government said that it was a matter for the SQA—which I agree with—but the SQA said that things were working “effectively and efficiently”.
Anyone who has looked at last year’s higher history exam results and the debate around them—whether they think that the outcome of the review is correct or still have questions—will notice, first, that that review was refused for some time. It took the former chief executive until September even to have a review. Then, the findings of that review were hotly disputed.
19:15The Scottish Association of Teachers of History survey quotes teachers of history in Scotland who said that the review of the SQA into its own examination was a “whitewash” and
“the most biased and useless investigation I have ever seen a public body attempt to pass off as legitimate”.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
I ask Miles Briggs to wind up and say whether he wishes to press or withdraw amendment 302.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
Amendment 74, in the name of Ross Greer, is grouped with amendments 75, 76, 79 to 83, 96 to 107, 109, 110 and 114.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division is: For 5, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
As the outcome of the division on amendment 278 is tied, I will use my casting vote as convener in order for the committee to reach a decision. I vote in favour of amendment 278.
Amendment 278 agreed to.
Amendment 279 not moved.
Section 12, as amended, agreed to.
Section 13 agreed to.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 261 disagreed to.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
Okay. Now that we have got you connected, and given that we have started this process, I will take you at the end.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
There are two solutions. First, your points are now noted. The ultimate solution is for you to have your camera on throughout our proceedings, as you do during divisions. If you are happy to be viewed throughout the entire time, that is certainly what we will do in the evening session.
However, we cannot go back. It might be no comfort, because your vote was not recorded, but your vote would not have made a difference to the result of that division if you were voting in the same way as your SNP colleagues. It would not have changed the outcome of the division on the amendment. As soon as it was brought to my attention by one of your colleagues, we were able to get you up on the screen to take part in the subsequent votes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The solution is that, for the evening session, if you are happy, your camera will be on for the entire time, because you are seeing us, so we should be able to see you. If you are comfortable with that, that will ensure that we always see you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
Welcome back. We continue our consideration of the Education (Scotland) Bill at the second day of stage 2. We will move straight to proceedings.
After section 13
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
I am happy with that. Ms Haughey, are you also happy for your camera to be on for the session? Since you are sat there anyway, we might as well be able to see you. As I said, we have recorded all your votes subsequent to amendment 261, but it would not have changed the outcome for that amendment. Your points are also noted.