The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1956 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
I call Ross Greer to wind up, and to press or withdraw amendment 36.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
Amendment 255, in the name of Pam Duncan-Glancy, is grouped with amendments 256 to 261, 68, 69, 262 to 271, 70, 272 to 274, 130, 275 to 279, 285 and 208.
I point out that, due to pre-emption, if amendment 68 is agreed to, I cannot call amendment 69 or amendments 63 to 65; if amendment 69 is agreed to, I cannot call amendments 62 and 63; and if amendment 70 is agreed to, I cannot call amendments 272 and 273.
I call Pam Duncan-Glancy to move amendment 255 and speak to all amendments in the group.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
I call Stephen Kerr to speak to amendment 270 and the other amendments in the group.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 8, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 245 disagreed to.
Amendments 61 and 62 moved—[Ross Greer]—and agreed to.
Amendment 129 moved—[Miles Briggs].
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
I do not believe that it would be too narrow. We have a bill in front of us that does two things. In the part that covers qualifications Scotland’s formation, there is an opportunity to strengthen the capacity for investigation of complaints. If there is an opportunity to do that at a wider level, I might look at that. However, the opportunity that we have as a committee is to scrutinise the bill and the new bodies, so it is right to do so. The fact that the amendments are quite narrow might address some of Mr Mason’s concerns that the proposal would be expensive—I hope that the fact that the proposal is so narrow means that it would not be.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 74 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
There will be a division.
For
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Mason, John (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind)
Against
Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP)
Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Haughey, Clare (Rutherglen) (SNP)
Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD)
Ross, Douglas (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
I absolutely believe that we need to add a body, because otherwise we will have the status quo, which, despite the changes that might be happening and will continue to take place, has lost the trust of teachers and other professionals in the education sector in Scotland. In the debate on amendment 232, the cabinet secretary said that there is an inherent lack of trust. We all know that—the cabinet secretary accepts it and every single member of the committee, and probably of the Parliament, accepts it. Given that inherent lack of trust, having an independent body to look at such issues would resolve some of those points.
An independent regulator might have come to exactly the same conclusions as the SQA’s inquiry did last year, but it is more likely that those conclusions would have been accepted if they had come from an independent body rather than the SQA being seen to mark its own homework.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
I am not calling you to wind up quite yet. I will bring the cabinet secretary back in.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 271 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.