The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1956 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 114 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
There will be a division.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Yes, you can, because that is what all other witnesses do. For example, when we have the Scottish Government in front of us, it will give us ballpark low and high figures. That is then scrutinised by the Finance and Public Administration Committee, which some members of this committee are on. That is exactly what witnesses do, bill after bill, time after time.
We have to make progress. Also in response to Willie Rennie, you said that you did not accept that there could be pressures between funding for university and colleges and funding for apprenticeships. It is only a few months since the Funding Council found an additional £10 million for the University of Dundee. There was a Government announcement in the chamber that there would be £15 million and that went up to £25 million, £22 million of which went to Dundee university. That was its request. The SFC was able to find £10 million for that. How can you guarantee that there will not be similar requests in the future that will mean that the SFC has to find sums of money, and that those sums of money will not come from apprenticeships?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Of course.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Amendment 305, in the name of Stephen Kerr, is grouped with amendments 306, 309, 310 and 312. I point out that amendments 309, 310 and 312 are pre-empted by amendment 158, which was previously debated in the group on the independence of the chief inspector.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Mr Boyle, I want to follow up a couple of your answers to Willie Rennie. Let me see whether I have got this right. You do not agree or disagree with the £30 million transition cost that Skills Development Scotland believes that the bill would involve, but are you honestly saying that you have come to the committee as a representative of the Scottish Funding Council without knowing what the cost of taking on the proposed new responsibilities will be?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
I will say it again. You have neither agreed nor disagreed with the £30 million figure that SDS has suggested will be the transition cost, but surely you have not come to the committee that is scrutinising the bill to say that the Scottish Funding Council does not know what the cost of taking on the proposed extra responsibilities will be.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Despite knowing all that and knowing the Funding Council’s record in achieving that, people are still worried that, when you take on the proposed extra responsibility, there will not be the same focus on apprenticeships. That is what I am trying to get at. Even with your past record, people are still concerned about that issue.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
In response to another question from Pam Duncan-Glancy, you said that you had read the reports that there were concerns that there would not be a focus on apprenticeships if the transfer to the Funding Council goes ahead but that that will not be the case. Given that you know that there are concerns about that, although we take you at your word, we need more than that. What is your evidence that there will not be a lack of focus on apprenticeships in future, given that you know that that is a concern of a number of people outwith the committee?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
If it were not for that moratorium, would the numbers be higher?