The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1956 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
The Prosper submission discusses how apprenticeships work in England, particularly with regard to the flexible workforce development fund. Given that we have different approaches across the UK, are there models, or examples within models, that we could adopt from other parts of the UK that would benefit how we deliver apprenticeships in Scotland?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
It is interesting that you raise the OECD report, which I have seen. You have had meetings at ministerial level and, I presume, official level. In those meetings, have you asked why some of that report’s conclusions and deliberations have not been included in the bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Another question that I put to the previous panel was whether that should have been done before now. I have heard their answers, and I accept them. Of course, we can always look back with the benefit of hindsight, but were there insurmountable blockages before that prevented the achievement of what the bill seeks to do now, or, given what you have said, Mr Boyle, about the complexities and other issues, is there a good reason why we are only doing this now, in 2025?
I think that, from what you have said so far, this is fairly straightforward. Mr Yeates does not agree with that, and certainly his board does not agree with that. Why are we looking at this now when we did not in the past?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
There will be a division.
For
Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con)
Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD)
Ross, Douglas (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Kidd, Bill (Glasgow Anniesland) (SNP)
Mason, John (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind)
Abstentions
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division on amendment 328 is: For 2, Against 8, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 328 disagreed to.
Amendments 329, 330 and 91 not moved.
Section 35 agreed to.
After section 35
Amendment 173 not moved.
Section 36—Inspection plan
Amendment 174 not moved.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
We turn to the group entitled “Inspection plans: preparation and matters to be covered”. Amendment 331, in the name of Pam Duncan-Glancy, is grouped with amendments 175, 25, 176, 177, 334, 38, 92, 92A, 92B and 39.
I point out that amendment 39 is pre-empted by amendment 179, which was previously debated in the group entitled “Independence of the chief inspector”.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
I call Willie Rennie to wind up and to press or withdraw amendment 308.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
I remind members that, if amendment 158, in the name of Sue Webber, is agreed to, I cannot call amendments 309, 310, 159, 311, 85 or 312, due to pre-emptions.
Amendments 158, 309, 310, 159, 311 and 85 not moved.
Amendment 312 moved—[Pam Duncan-Glancy]—and agreed to.
Amendment 160 not moved.
Section 30, as amended, agreed to.
After section 30
Amendments 24 and 313 not moved.
Section 31—Meaning of “relevant educational establishment” and “excepted establishment”
Amendment 161 not moved.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Amendment 87, in the name of the cabinet secretary, is grouped with amendments 317, 318, 169 and 350.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Amendment 319, in the name of Stephen Kerr, is grouped with amendments 168, 170, 321, 322, 89, 90, 323, 171 and 358. I remind members that amendment 322 is pre-empted by amendment 88, which was previously debated in the group on safeguarding: people and buildings.