The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3822 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Why was the date that was chosen the night before the committee appearance?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
—as there had been for some time.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Were you happy that it published the article the night before the meeting?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
It was January.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Okay.
One comment that was issued by the SQA was this:
“We asked SATH to remove any part of the survey results that identified members of SQA staff.”
Do you stand by that comment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
The comment was this:
“We asked SATH to remove any part of the survey results that identified members of SQA staff.”
Do you stand by that comment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Stop there. Ms Stewart, is Mr Booth correct?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
No, they were not. I have the email that you sent to Kirsty MacDonald at 9:57 am on Friday 20 December 2024. Do you say at any point in that email that you are acting on behalf of the union?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
It is not clear at all.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Is it the trade union, though? That communication does not mention a member of staff.
Another redaction that you asked for was point 5 in the final comment on page 56 of the survey, which says:
“More openness
Many appointees seem fearful of criticising the SQA due to reports of other appointees having been removed from marking duties for expressing critical views.”
That does not mention an individual member of staff that a union would be concerned about.