The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3822 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
It is not a difficult question, Mr Booth, and I am going to ask it for maybe the third or fourth time. You issued a statement, on behalf of the SQA, in response to evidence that the committee received from SATH, and you said:
“We asked SATH to remove any part of the survey results that identified members of SQA staff.”
Did the SQA also ask SATH to remove any other comments that were critical of the SQA?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
It is not a leadership team of one.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
That it is or is not a team of one?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
The committee would be interested in the outcome of that conversation.
Mr Booth, you looked into that. You can correct me if I am wrong, but you issued a statement that said:
“in relation to a suggestion that a 2020 SATH survey was withdrawn at the request of the SQA staff, we are asking SATH for more information to allow us to look into this further.”
Have you looked into this further?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
I understand that none of you was in your current position in 2020. However, quite an explosive part of the evidence that the committee received was that there had been requests to withhold not just the current survey, which was done last year, but the 2020 survey. What investigation did you do before coming to the committee today to ascertain whether or not the SQA asked for the 2020 survey to be withheld?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Rebecca was quite upset.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Sorry, Mr Booth. In the meeting when you discussed what you would say in response to a national paper’s inquiry, did Fiona Robertson—the outgoing chief executive of the SQA—have any knowledge or mention any knowledge of the 2020 report?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Finally, a lot of the mistrust has resurfaced because of the investigation that the SQA did into its own performance that was then peer reviewed. I am going to read a quote that I got from a constituent who emailed me just a couple of weeks ago. It is important give that context, because this is not someone who was disappointed at the time; this is someone who continues to be disappointed. Certainly, I have been receiving that kind of feedback for some time. She said to me:
“This situation has unfairly placed the blame on teaching staff, rather than the SQA taking accountability for these changes. The facts remain: children suffered as a result, university places were affected and trust lost on both sides.”
She goes on to say:
“It has felt like a them-and-us situation for far too long.”
Finally, she says:
“I want to make clear I have no personal axe to grind, nor am I a committee member of SATH. I am simply a concerned teacher who is worried about the continual lack of compassion, clarity and consistency from the SQA, that it will not only negatively impact the results of our learners, but will also erode the good will of teachers.”
Everything that the SQA has been trying to do since it launched its review is clearly not working for that individual teacher or, I know, for others. Therefore, will you consider holding a truly independent review into last year’s higher history exam, given that teachers said just a couple of weeks ago that they still believe that they do not have the answers to what happened last year?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Would a truly independent review not either back up the case that is made in the SQA’s review or support the case that has been made by many teachers and learners across Scotland? It would not change things—I have accepted that, and I think that SATH accepted that when it came to the committee last month. However, it would produce—finally—something that everyone could accept. At the moment—and I accept that this is not a unanimous view—a large cohort of your staff and teachers do not trust the SQA’s review of its own operations. Is there not an opportunity to rebuild that trust, which you have spoken about very articulately throughout today’s evidence session, by having a truly independent review of what happened last year in order to learn those lessons?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
The next affirmative instrument to be considered is the draft Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exclusions and Exceptions) (Scotland) Amendment (No 2) Order 2025. Do members have any questions or comments on the instrument?
Members indicated disagreement.