The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2633 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
No. I am sorry, but this is quite an important question. We have maybe two Cabinet meetings left before 26 September. You could even take a 50:50 punt and guess which one it might be, but you are suggesting that, at the moment, there is no knowledge within your department of when the Cabinet is going to be asked to discuss the matter. My point is going to be to ask what discussions on that there have been at the Cabinet so far.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I bring in Liz Smith.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
The bill will fall if you do nothing before—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
The issues with COSLA and the teacher unions are all clear in our stage 1 report, which is very balanced. They were highlighted in evidence and in the report, and the committee approved the general principles of the bill at stage 1, as did the Parliament.
All the considerations that you have just articulated to Jackie Dunbar are not considerations for your determination on the financial resolution. I presume that they were for whether you as an individual and the Government supported the bill at stage 1. They were not significant enough to make you vote against the bill at stage 1—you simply abstained. Surely, therefore, those issues have already been debated and discussed, and the will of the Parliament is that we should scrutinise the bill further at stages 2 and 3. Those issues are not a significant part of the financial resolution. We have done the bit about COSLA and the unions, it is in the stage 1 report and there have been two votes on it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
It concerns me that, in a fortnight, you are going to make a decision without those figures. We have to go back to Ms Duncan-Glancy’s point that you have had five and a half months to get to the stage and you are still telling us and members of your own party that you do not know what the costs are. Are you going to take a decision without having all the information?
09:15Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Okay, we will move to Pam Duncan-Glancy.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Do you agree with them?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
It is not about the financial resolution or spending in future. It is simply about taking a vote at stage 1 in the chamber of this Parliament, where an overwhelming majority of MSPs voted in favour of a bill progressing. We agreed the general principles, and we voted for the bill to progress to stage 2, which this committee can do. We could get you and the member in charge back in to discuss Government amendments and backbench amendments, and then we could have another debate at stage 3 and decide that it has not changed enough, that we have not met the threshold for the improvements that are needed and that therefore the bill will fall at stage 3. Parliament and parliamentarians would then have been given that opportunity. If you fail to lodge the financial resolution, there is no such opportunity.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
The member’s approximate cost for the bill is £30 million, and with some changes it could cost £50 million. We have also heard a £5 million figure today. If £30 million is too much for a financial resolution, what figure could the Government live with?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
It goes back to Mr Rennie’s point that, although you state that you are neutral on the bill, it sounds like you are against the bill at any cost.