The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2633 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
We want to get into a lot of those areas.
We will move to questions from committee members.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Does Fraser McKinlay want to come back in?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Do you think that that is an area in the bill that should be strengthened?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I call Roz McCall.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I think that a number of us will be searching for that information, so, if you find it first, please inform the committee.
The committee had quite a lot of responses to the call for views that were supportive of the provision to expand the circumstances under which the relevant person could be temporarily excluded from a hearing. Sheriff Mackie, you raised potential difficulties with assessing whether someone was causing “significant distress” to a child, and you suggested that a more rights-based approach could be adopted. Could you briefly explain how that would work?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
That is very helpful. Our questions have been wide ranging, as have your answers, which shows the scope of the bill. We appreciate your time. If we have not covered certain points, we certainly have the information in your written evidence, which was comprehensive and very much appreciated by the committee. It will help to form our conclusions on stage 1.
Thank you all for staying beyond the allocated time. I will briefly suspend the meeting to allow for a changeover of witnesses. We will be back in 10 minutes.
11:33 Meeting suspended.Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I welcome our second panel of witnesses today and reiterate my apologies that we are running behind—I am grateful that you have been patient with us. I think that you can remain for the session.
I formally welcome Claire Burns, director of CELCIS; Kate Thompson, policy officer for the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland; Katy Nisbet, head of legal policy at Clan Childlaw; and Maria Galli, convener of the child and family law sub-committee at the Law Society of Scotland.
We will pick up on a lot of what we heard from the earlier witnesses. One of Fraser McKinlay’s final points was about how some of the legislation adds to the Children (Scotland) Act 1995, which, because it is pre-devolution is outwith the scope of the UNCRC and the ability to appeal. What are your concerns? We have certainly had a lot of submissions and that is one of the big issues that has come up in responses to our call for evidence. It has been highlighted by a number of people and, as I say, Mr McKinlay mentioned it towards the end of the earlier session. Would anyone like to explain their concerns about it and what can be done to resolve those concerns?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
As the Housing (Scotland) Bill is at a more advanced stage, are there any lessons that we can learn about how that issue was approached at stage 1 and stage 2, or is there still further work to be done?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
How have we got to a point where so many respondents have highlighted that concern? I presume that the Government knew what it was doing. It has engaged in some ways and was aware of similar issues with other bills. Is it your understanding that the Government took a decision and that the situation is not merely a consequence of it not fully understanding what would happen here? Can anyone answer that? We will certainly put it to the minister.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I will make ask some final questions before I turn to other members. Can you imagine any reason or rationale for the Government deciding to do that? What do you think the Government’s response will be? What would you say to any suggested counterargument against what you are unanimously saying, which is that the bill takes the wrong approach? The Government has probably thought about it and decided to go down that route. Can you imagine any counterargument that the Government would come up with, or do you think that it will have to make changes at stage 2?