The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2633 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I know—it definitely wasn’t directed at me.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I would like to come in before you move on to other points.
Ms O’Brien, is your concern at such a level that, should the Government not accept what has been said in various responses about the need for compliance with the UNCRC to be incorporated in stand-alone parts of the legislation, you would be unable to support the bill as a whole? Are your concerns so significant that, if people do not have that right of appeal through the UNCRC, support for the bill overall could be under threat?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you all very much. That concludes today’s evidence session on the bill. I am grateful for your time, insight and contributions to this important part of parliamentary scrutiny.
The committee will now move into private session to consider its final agenda item.
12:53 Meeting continued in private until 13:12.Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Douglas Ross
We move to questions from Ross Greer.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I welcome our second panel of witnesses: Lynne O'Brien, chief officer for children and families at Aberlour; Duncan Dunlop; Natalie Williams, head of policy and campaigns at the Fostering Network; and Jo Derrick, chief executive officer of the Scottish Throughcare and Aftercare Forum. I thank them all for their time today and for their submissions.
I began with a very open question to the first panel and it took half an hour to get through that, so I will try to be a bit tighter with my questions. Although there are positives in your submissions, I am really keen to hear about where you think the bill needs to be improved and developed and about what is missing, and I know that other members will also come to that. If you want to talk about the positives, please do so, but the committee really has to scrutinise where the bill can be improved.
Ms Derrick, I will start with you. Are there any areas where the bill could be improved that you would like to focus on?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Before I turn to Mr Dunlop, I can say that it is useful to get that overview and that other committee members will delve further into those issues.
We heard from some of last week’s witnesses that they felt that there had been lack of engagement in advance of the bill being published, although there was more engagement after that. Do you have similar concerns? Could some of those issues have been addressed if there had been improved engagement between Scottish Government ministers or civil servants and all of you, or have you been satisfied with the engagement that you have had on the bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Douglas Ross
All the political parties have signed up to the Promise and are supportive of it. You mention in your evidence that it is 3,256 days since Nicola Sturgeon made that commitment and got cross-party support. Why do you feel that we are at the stage that we are at now, and that the bill that has been produced by the Scottish Government lacks any of the ambition that you would expect? There is political will, and that is surely the biggest thing that the Government needs behind it. It has the political will and consensus across the Parliament. Why has it not gone further through the bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Hearing you talk about love suggests that there is a different side to you that I have not seen before, Mr Adam. [Laughter.]
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I accept that. That is a legal question, which we will definitely put to the minister.
The minister has already taken a decision to frame the bill in such a way that there are elements that are outwith the UNCRC, because it refers back to the 1995 act. If that is not rectified, would that be a significant enough concern for you to say, “We shouldn’t support this bill”?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you. Given that we are on the topic of hearings, I will delve a little further into that with you, Sheriff Mackie. Your working group recommended that the obligation on a child to attend hearings should be replaced with a presumption that they will attend. The bill removes the obligation but does not replace it with such a presumption. What do you think of that and what concerns do you have about it? Should there be a difference in the types of hearings at which there should be either an obligation or a presumption on a child to attend?