The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2633 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I will put to Ms Leitch and then to Mr Higgins another question that I put to the first panel.
As a parent of two children in mainstream education, why do I get a phone call as soon as there is a minor scrape on my child’s knee, but parents whose children are restrained and secluded get no notification at all? Why is that continuing to happen today and why does it take legislation such as the bill to sort that out?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Ms Killean, would you like to come in?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
What are you doing as the children’s commissioner? You know that this is happening in Scotland, and you know that, when it is happening, it is breaching the human rights of that child. What are you doing about it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I understand all that. However, you know that there is a breach of multiple people’s human rights, every time that this occurs.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
If a parent contacted you this afternoon—perhaps this session will raise awareness—to say that their child has been or is regularly secluded and locked away on their own and told they cannot leave, what advice would you give?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
—but that it should, potentially, be recorded the following day, to take the emotion out of it and make sure that we have the right information. The bill currently says
“as soon as possible and ... no later than 24 hours after ... the incident”.
Are you saying that that needs to be tightened? Twenty-four hours means, potentially, that if the incident happens at the end of one school day, the child has gone back before the end of the next school day.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
What are witnesses’ views on the AHDS submission, which said that there is a risk of inadvertent breaches in the proposed timescales if the incident occurs at the end of the school week or school term? Basically, it says that having a weekend or a number of weeks off may lead to breaches if the constraint is 24 hours. I have some concerns about that. Are those shared, or do witnesses agree with the points that were made by that association?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Again, that is the point that I wanted to ask about. The Association of Headteachers and Deputes in Scotland has said that there is a risk of
“inadvertent breaches”
of the timescales that are proposed in the bill should the incident occur
“at the end of the school week or school term”.
My worry is that that is when it is more vital for families to get the information sooner. There might be a reason not to do that; we will ask education officials about that when they come before us. There might be some mitigating reason, but I cannot think of it. Surely, at the end of a school week, you would want that information to go to the family before a child goes home for the weekend and the family is left unaware of what went on at school. Would the panel agree with that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I call Paul McLennan.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I welcome our second panel of witnesses: Sarah Leitch, director of development at the British Institute of Learning Disabilities; Nicola Killean, the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland; and Ben Higgins, chief executive officer of the Restraint Reduction Network. I welcome them all and know that most of them were here watching the first panel.
Ms Killean, I will start with you. My question to the first panel was about why it has taken us so long to get to this point. Your evidence says that the Government has missed opportunities to use its own legislation to do something. Campaigners have been calling for change for a long time and there have been opportunities for the Government to make changes, but we are now looking at a non-Government bill. Why has that happened?