The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1956 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Douglas Ross
I understand the criticisms of and concerns about apprenticeships that were raised in the Withers report. What is your response to the report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which was actually quite positive about what we are doing here and said that other countries could learn from the way in which apprenticeships are delivered in Scotland? I ask that question for balance.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Good.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Douglas Ross
I do not want to take up too much more time. However, in response to Pam Duncan-Glancy, you have not really told us what the new organisation, and bringing this area into the SFC, would do that would change that. You have spoken a lot about discussions and a desire, but can you give us one tangible thing that the SFC will do that is not currently being done in SDS, and that would take that completion rate beyond 76 per cent?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Douglas Ross
That could be done by SDS, though. Answering your two questions about what it would be able to do if it were allowed free rein and if any impediments were removed might change some of the issues that we have.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Good.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Last week, one point that was put to us in evidence was that those meetings are useful, but staff sometimes think that they cannot ask the really challenging questions when a minister is in front of them, which is why they leave it to their union representatives in the specific meetings between the unions, you and your officials. Do you take that on board?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Douglas Ross
While we are on the financial aspects, minister, can you tell us the amount that has been raised by the apprenticeship levy in Scotland each year in the past couple of years?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Douglas Ross
When the Economy and Fair Work Committee wrote to you, it asked the Scottish Government to clarify the amount raised by the apprenticeship levy in Scotland and to provide a breakdown of how it is allocated in Scotland. Can you answer none of that question, because of those circumstances?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Douglas Ross
My understanding is that SDS has written to the director general about the issue and has made a second request for a letter of comfort. Clearly, it has not been reassured by those reassurances. Can you commit to looking into that further?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Douglas Ross
The board has concerns that SDS staff appear to be excluded from workshops that fundamentally explore the shape of the reformed SFC, of which they will be part.