The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2871 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Douglas Ross
My question was about the timing of the instrument that is in front of the committee today. Given that I think that you are accepting that the bill will have to be heavily amended—whether you believe that that is because the bill is not good enough or because, in a Parliament of minorities, you will have to accept that—and given that there will be changes to the bill before it is passed at stage 3, if it is successful, why is the order coming forward now? I know that there is precedent for taking things forward after stage 1, but has that been the case where there has been so much criticism of a bill at stage 1?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Douglas Ross
We are being asked to start the process now to have things in place for day 1 if the Education (Scotland) Bill is passed. If the bill does not pass—given that legitimate concerns have been raised at stage 1 and we do not know what amendments will or will not be accepted at stage 2, or what the ultimate outcome will be at stage 3—I am querying what would happen if appointments have been made to a body that does not exist.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Douglas Ross
You cannot provide that assurance. You simply cannot do that and neither can the cabinet secretary or the Government, because we have been tasked by the Parliament with scrutinising the bill and making amendments that will not be considered or voted on until April. I therefore find it very difficult to see why and how we can support the instrument today, given the acceptance that I think we have had from the cabinet secretary and from you as officials that things could change significantly at stages 2 and 3.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Douglas Ross
In fairness, I did allude to that earlier. My point—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Douglas Ross
They would usually come from a wide range of organisations and backgrounds. Cabinet secretary, do you want to come back in?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Douglas Ross
It is also a real inherent risk that the Government will be aware of. I have already asked a couple of times what the Government’s contingency plan is if the draft order is not passed today because of members’ concerns—not their views on the bill itself or on qualifications Scotland, but their concerns about not being able to influence the bill before stage 2.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Douglas Ross
Mr Brown.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Douglas Ross
Mr Brown.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Douglas Ross
Can we switch off Mr Brown’s microphone?
Mr Brown, I was just going to clarify that, at no point—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Douglas Ross
Mr Brown, I will suspend the meeting if you cannot control yourself. [Interruption.] Mr Brown, are you challenging the chair? [Interruption.] Mr Brown, I am trying to clarify the point. [Interruption.] You have suggested that the convener was saying something on behalf of the committee. Like you, I am a member of the committee, in which I can ask the cabinet secretary questions and get responses. We have a decision to make on the order, which the committee will take. I cannot influence that in any way. We will either agree or disagree on the motion that the cabinet secretary will shortly be invited to move. That is all that is happening at the moment, and we are scrutinising the proposal.
You cannot, in all fairness, say that I am suggesting something when there is a process that is laid out in front of me that we will go through to allow all members to ask their questions and have them answered, and then make a determination on the order in front of us. If you can continue on those grounds, I am happy to go back to you, Mr Brown.