The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2633 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
We move to John Mason.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Does it matter whether there is the physical barrier of the locked door or a person, or a verbal instruction not to move?
12:15Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Is this bill not the opportunity to move away from it? I understand restraint as a final tool to stop a child from injuring themselves or others, but seclusion is not really the same, if you are saying that it breaches that child’s human rights.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Ross Greer?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Ultimately, you believe that there should be no circumstances in which restraint and seclusion would be available. The vast majority of respondents say that they should be available as a last resort. Are you saying that they should be excluded completely?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Ms Martin, I come to you. I want to talk particularly about the figures that Ms Sanger gave during her opening remarks that, in the month since the schools went back, 81 families have contacted them with concerns. Is that the type of number that the National Autistic Society is hearing from? Is that the level of the problem that we in Scotland are facing?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
On that point, do you think that the terminology should be changed if the bill progresses?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you. That sets us up very well for the remainder of our evidence session and the further evidence that we will take.
Dr Webster, in your response to the call for views, you say:
“Enable’s own Scottish Council—which sets our campaign priorities—identified ending abusive restraint and seclusion as a top priority in recent years. The overwhelming weight of evidence from our members and others shows that without legislation, children’s rights will continue to be breached.”
You support the bill. Why has it taken us so long to get to this stage, if you and your members and campaigners have been calling for this for many years?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you all for your evidence today and your answers to our questions. It has been a very helpful start to our stage 1 consideration of this non-Government bill from Daniel Johnson.
I suspend the meeting briefly.
10:52 Meeting suspended.Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Ross
No—your evidence says that you want a clear definition, but you also quite clearly state that you
“do not take a position on the preferred definition of restraint and seclusion”.
I thought that you would. There might be some disagreement about the definition, and we can have that debate, but surely you should be able to offer your view, and the commissioner’s office’s view, on a clear definition.