The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3821 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
The third instrument is being considered under the negative procedure. If members have no comments, does the committee agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations on the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
The final instrument is also being considered under the negative procedure. As with the second instrument, this SSI was considered yesterday by the DPLR Committee, which again made some drafting recommendations. If members have no comments, does the committee agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations on the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
That concludes the public part of our proceedings. The committee will now move into private session to consider the final items on its agenda.
12:31 Meeting continued in private until 13:08.Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Everyone has got a different opinion from you at the moment.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
And none of those people want you to change your plans. We will come back to a number of those issues.
I bring in Jackie Dunbar.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Professor Miller, because Mr Adam started speaking about some of the local area around the University of the West of Scotland, I note that this week or at the end of last week the “Complete University Guide” annual league table was published and the University of the West of Scotland Paisley was the lowest ranked of all the Scottish universities on that list. How do you respond to that and what will you do to try to improve your position for next year?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Given the massive cuts that you are overseeing at the University of Edinburgh, do you think that an area where we could see a reduction is your salary?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
No. We need you to answer for the Official Report.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You had an overall score of 42 and a UK ranking of 128 and, as I say, you were lowest out of 15 Scottish universities, given that two are not part of it. Do you want us to accept that, because of the metrics that are used, you will always perform poorly in this? Although you say that you are not chasing some of these metrics, this is a well-respected guide. You may not agree with everything that it does, but students who are looking for their places in the future will look at it and be concerned that the University of the West of Scotland is so low down the rankings not just for Scotland but for the UK.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Do you think that you should do something differently, given that such a vote is unprecedented in your time as principal? Our understanding from the submission that you have seen is that on 26 March the senate expressed deep concern about the impact of the proposed cut of £140 million over 18 months and that subsequently, the no confidence vote was taken because the senate’s concerns had not been addressed by the university executive. It was not a knee-jerk reaction. There were almost two months from one meeting to another in which there was an opportunity for you to address the concerns of the senate. Clearly, the senate believed that nothing had been done because it went ahead with the vote and stated that it had no confidence in you and the executive.