The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3123 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Ross
There will be a division.
For
Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con)
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
Ross, Douglas (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Kidd, Bill (Glasgow Anniesland) (SNP)
Mason, John (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind)
McLennan, Paul (East Lothian) (SNP)
Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD)
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 81 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Ross
I call Ross Greer to speak to amendment 86 and the other amendments in the group.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Ross
I have also discussed that with Universities Scotland and there seems to be a lack of understanding or knowledge about how reclassification would be triggered. What will happen? Do 10 amendments have to be passed and the tenth one triggers the ONS to say that a university has lost its classification? I am unsure.
We are at stage 2 and the minister is potentially agreeing to look at more amendments at stage 3. At what point will that trigger be triggered and how will we know about it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 84 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Ross
That is very kind of you, Mr Rennie. It is unexpected but very welcome praise from you and other members. I hope that that means that our stage 2 deliberations on the Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill will be very collegiate and good mannered.
Given that this is the first day of stage 2, I have been asked to, once again, go through the process that we will be following for anyone who is watching online. The amendments that have been lodged to the bill have been grouped together. There will be one debate on each group of amendments. I will call the member who lodged the first amendment in the group to speak to and move that amendment and to speak to all other amendments in the group.
I will then call other members who have lodged amendments in the group. Members who have not lodged amendments in the group but who wish to speak should catch my attention. If the minister has not already spoken in the debate on the group, I will then invite him to contribute. The debate on the group will be concluded by my inviting the member who moved the first amendment in the group to wind up.
Following the debate on each group, I will check whether the member who moved the first amendment in the group wishes to press that amendment to a vote or to withdraw it. If they wish to press it, I will put the question on that amendment. If a member wishes to withdraw their amendment after it has been moved, they must seek the agreement of other members to do so. If any member who is present objects, the committee will immediately move to a vote on that amendment. If any member does not want to move their amendment when it is called, they should say, “Not moved,” although please note that any other member who is present may move it. If no one moves the amendment, I will immediately call the next amendment in the marshalled list.
Only committee members are allowed to vote. Voting in any division will be by a show of hands, so it is important that members keep their hands clearly raised until the clerks have recorded the vote.
The committee is required to indicate formally that it has considered and agreed to each section of the bill, so I will put the question on each section at the appropriate point.
Now that we have covered the procedure, we will start the substantive business.
Before section 1
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Ross
I call Miles Briggs to wind up and to press or withdraw amendment 50.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 52 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Ross
There will be a division.
For
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Against
Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP)
Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
Kidd, Bill (Glasgow Anniesland) (SNP)
Mason, John (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind)
McLennan, Paul (East Lothian) (SNP)
Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD)
Ross, Douglas (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 53 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.