Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 10 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2307 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

The comment was this:

“We asked SATH to remove any part of the survey results that identified members of SQA staff.”

Do you stand by that comment?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Stop there. Ms Stewart, is Mr Booth correct?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

No, they were not. I have the email that you sent to Kirsty MacDonald at 9:57 am on Friday 20 December 2024. Do you say at any point in that email that you are acting on behalf of the union?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

It is not clear at all.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Is it the trade union, though? That communication does not mention a member of staff.

Another redaction that you asked for was point 5 in the final comment on page 56 of the survey, which says:

“More openness

Many appointees seem fearful of criticising the SQA due to reports of other appointees having been removed from marking duties for expressing critical views.”

That does not mention an individual member of staff that a union would be concerned about.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Okay, I am going to read out a final three comments. They are all redactions requested by you, whether through the union or not. When I read them out, can you tell me whether they name or identify one individual member of SQA?

You asked for a redaction on page 52 of the survey results where it says,

“needs an independent review … need to get rid of incompetent leaders and team managers”.

Does that identify any individual member of SQA staff—yes or no?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

It mentions “leaders” and “team managers”. You cannot identify an individual from that.

You also asked for this to be redacted from page 48:

“entirely new qualifications team. I have no confidence in the current leadership structure.”

Does that identify an individual member of SQA staff? It is speaking about the leadership structure.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

I was contacted by a faculty head who has tried to use that. Will you respond to his concerns, which I will quote? He said:

“History teachers from my school and others I know have emailed the dedicated email address with little resolution to their queries.”

He continued:

“Responses to date have said that the specific question can’t be answered”

and that, instead,

“text which feels like an automated response with links to “Understanding Standards” and course reports”

is sent on, although they have already seen and read those things.

He then communicated with the escalated email address. The SQA responded after two weeks and apologised for the delay—the response should have come within five days—but all the SQA sent was three bullet points and another hyperlink. In the teacher’s response to that, he said:

“If this is an escalated response, I dread to think what others are receiving. It’s clear to see the email address service is nothing more than a publicity stunt, and the SQA have no interest in providing help to teachers across the country, who are on their knees and crying out for help.”

What is your response to a faculty head who is raising those concerns about the measures that you have put in place to deal with exactly the problems that he and his team are experiencing?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Interests

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Douglas Ross

Thank you very much.

That concludes the public part of our proceedings.

09:30 Meeting continued in private until 11:43.  

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Interests

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Douglas Ross

Good morning and welcome to the fourth meeting in 2025 of the Education, Children and Young People Committee.

I welcome Keith Brown, who is joining us as a committee member and replacing our previous colleague, Evelyn Tweed. On behalf of the committee, I thank Evelyn for her work as deputy convener and as a conscientious member of the committee.

As this is his first meeting as a committee member, I invite Keith to declare any relevant interests.