The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2307 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
The comment was this:
“We asked SATH to remove any part of the survey results that identified members of SQA staff.”
Do you stand by that comment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Stop there. Ms Stewart, is Mr Booth correct?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
No, they were not. I have the email that you sent to Kirsty MacDonald at 9:57 am on Friday 20 December 2024. Do you say at any point in that email that you are acting on behalf of the union?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
It is not clear at all.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Is it the trade union, though? That communication does not mention a member of staff.
Another redaction that you asked for was point 5 in the final comment on page 56 of the survey, which says:
“More openness
Many appointees seem fearful of criticising the SQA due to reports of other appointees having been removed from marking duties for expressing critical views.”
That does not mention an individual member of staff that a union would be concerned about.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Okay, I am going to read out a final three comments. They are all redactions requested by you, whether through the union or not. When I read them out, can you tell me whether they name or identify one individual member of SQA?
You asked for a redaction on page 52 of the survey results where it says,
“needs an independent review … need to get rid of incompetent leaders and team managers”.
Does that identify any individual member of SQA staff—yes or no?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
It mentions “leaders” and “team managers”. You cannot identify an individual from that.
You also asked for this to be redacted from page 48:
“entirely new qualifications team. I have no confidence in the current leadership structure.”
Does that identify an individual member of SQA staff? It is speaking about the leadership structure.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
I was contacted by a faculty head who has tried to use that. Will you respond to his concerns, which I will quote? He said:
“History teachers from my school and others I know have emailed the dedicated email address with little resolution to their queries.”
He continued:
“Responses to date have said that the specific question can’t be answered”
and that, instead,
“text which feels like an automated response with links to “Understanding Standards” and course reports”
is sent on, although they have already seen and read those things.
He then communicated with the escalated email address. The SQA responded after two weeks and apologised for the delay—the response should have come within five days—but all the SQA sent was three bullet points and another hyperlink. In the teacher’s response to that, he said:
“If this is an escalated response, I dread to think what others are receiving. It’s clear to see the email address service is nothing more than a publicity stunt, and the SQA have no interest in providing help to teachers across the country, who are on their knees and crying out for help.”
What is your response to a faculty head who is raising those concerns about the measures that you have put in place to deal with exactly the problems that he and his team are experiencing?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you very much.
That concludes the public part of our proceedings.
09:30 Meeting continued in private until 11:43.Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Douglas Ross
Good morning and welcome to the fourth meeting in 2025 of the Education, Children and Young People Committee.
I welcome Keith Brown, who is joining us as a committee member and replacing our previous colleague, Evelyn Tweed. On behalf of the committee, I thank Evelyn for her work as deputy convener and as a conscientious member of the committee.
As this is his first meeting as a committee member, I invite Keith to declare any relevant interests.