Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 10 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2307 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Did you recognise the criticisms of the “Understanding standards” events that we heard from the SATH representatives?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Having sat in on one event, did you deem it to be any different from, or worse or poorer than others? Is the 60 per cent rating that you mentioned standard, or would you normally get a higher positive percentage?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Can you confirm that the SQA was involved in a report by SATH not being published back in 2020?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

You did not want two similar surveys to be published at the same time.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Did you ask the outgoing chief executive if she had any knowledge of that before you issued the statement?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

You are the communications director and you heard that evidence but you did not speak to the chief executive to ask whether she was aware of that when she was around in 2020.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Who did you ask on the day? A request came in to you from a national paper on the day that the committee heard evidence. Given that, as Ms Rogers has said, you were not in position in 2020, who did you go to for historical guidance on the issue?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

We have spoken a lot about 2024’s higher history exam and its fallout, but the history issues go back further than that.

I am sure that you, Ms Rodgers, will be aware of the letter that was sent on 24 February 2019 by 10 national 5 history core team members. They said that they were concerned that a culture had recently developed within their subject area whereby

“any legitimate questioning of SQA policy and procedures will result in contracts not being renewed.”

As chair, you are dealing with the issue and its impact on current pupils and staff. However, it seems to those of us who have not been heavily involved in the issue for many years that it goes back far further.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

That concludes consideration of that group of instruments.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Okay. I appreciate that.

I thank you all very much for your time. You said that you would come back to us on a number of points—Ms Rogers and Ms Stewart certainly said that. If I get permission, I will share some of the testimony that we received, particularly emails, because I think that you have been troubled by some of the testimony that you have heard.

I have taken at face value what you said about scrutiny making for something better, Ms Rogers, and I hope that we have something better after our scrutiny today. It has been an intense session, but I think that you have all handled it extremely well. It has been longer than we anticipated, but that shows that there is a great deal of interest in the area. We saw that when we heard from the former chief executive, SATH and the cabinet secretary and we have now seen it with you.

It is not for me alone to decide, but I think that we would like to see you back at committee, Ms Rogers, to discuss wider issues to do with the forthcoming legislation and the work of the SQA.

I thank you all for your time today. I will suspend the meeting for about 10 minutes.

11:28 Meeting suspended.  

11:38 On resuming—