The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2307 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Rebecca was quite upset.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Sorry, Mr Booth. In the meeting when you discussed what you would say in response to a national paper’s inquiry, did Fiona Robertson—the outgoing chief executive of the SQA—have any knowledge or mention any knowledge of the 2020 report?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Finally, a lot of the mistrust has resurfaced because of the investigation that the SQA did into its own performance that was then peer reviewed. I am going to read a quote that I got from a constituent who emailed me just a couple of weeks ago. It is important give that context, because this is not someone who was disappointed at the time; this is someone who continues to be disappointed. Certainly, I have been receiving that kind of feedback for some time. She said to me:
“This situation has unfairly placed the blame on teaching staff, rather than the SQA taking accountability for these changes. The facts remain: children suffered as a result, university places were affected and trust lost on both sides.”
She goes on to say:
“It has felt like a them-and-us situation for far too long.”
Finally, she says:
“I want to make clear I have no personal axe to grind, nor am I a committee member of SATH. I am simply a concerned teacher who is worried about the continual lack of compassion, clarity and consistency from the SQA, that it will not only negatively impact the results of our learners, but will also erode the good will of teachers.”
Everything that the SQA has been trying to do since it launched its review is clearly not working for that individual teacher or, I know, for others. Therefore, will you consider holding a truly independent review into last year’s higher history exam, given that teachers said just a couple of weeks ago that they still believe that they do not have the answers to what happened last year?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Would a truly independent review not either back up the case that is made in the SQA’s review or support the case that has been made by many teachers and learners across Scotland? It would not change things—I have accepted that, and I think that SATH accepted that when it came to the committee last month. However, it would produce—finally—something that everyone could accept. At the moment—and I accept that this is not a unanimous view—a large cohort of your staff and teachers do not trust the SQA’s review of its own operations. Is there not an opportunity to rebuild that trust, which you have spoken about very articulately throughout today’s evidence session, by having a truly independent review of what happened last year in order to learn those lessons?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
The next affirmative instrument to be considered is the draft Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exclusions and Exceptions) (Scotland) Amendment (No 2) Order 2025. Do members have any questions or comments on the instrument?
Members indicated disagreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
As there are no comments, I invite the minister to move motion S6M-16127.
Motion moved,
That the Education, Children and Young People Committee recommends that the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exclusions and Exceptions) (Scotland) Amendment (No 2) Order 2025 [draft] be approved.—[Natalie Don-Innes]
Motion agreed to.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
As no other members want to speak, does the committee agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Do any members wish to raise questions?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
The committee must now produce a report on the draft instrument. Are members content to delegate responsibility to me, as convener, to agree the report on behalf of the committee?
Members indicated agreement.
11:45Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Douglas Ross
I will perhaps come on to that with Ms Stewart in a moment. When the chief executive came to the committee, she defended the internal review to the hilt. She is no longer in place. I am still unclear in my head whether, as chair of the SQA, you support 100 per cent the review, the way it was conducted and the findings of the review?