The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2307 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Were you given any reasons for the delayed response?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Douglas Ross
The 20 recommendations that you made in last year’s report were all either agreed to or partially agreed to by the Scottish Government, barring one, which concerned strengthening your remit to include colleges. I have discussed that with some of the representatives who are interested in this subject. Given that the Government is not keen on that and dismissed it completely, will that be a recommendation that you keep coming back to, or do you accept that the current Scottish Government will not agree to strengthening your remit?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Douglas Ross
These will be the final couple of questions from me for now. You say in your written evidence that you
“would not be supportive of crude interventions, which were deployed simply in order to achieve the next interim target.”
Would you outline some of those “crude interventions” that you think would be counterproductive?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Douglas Ross
I have not forgotten to come to Willie Rennie but, before I do so, I will close this part of the discussion. Ms McPherson, in response to Keith Brown and Ross Greer, you offered to give more information. We are doing quite a short inquiry on this subject, with our final evidence session next week, so I do not want to set too strict a timeframe, but getting that information as quickly as possible would allow us to consider that as part of our report.
I thank you all for your evidence today. This session and the earlier one with the commissioner have been a wide-ranging and in-depth look at some of the factors that affect fair access.
Ms McPherson, we would also like to take advantage of your presence here today to ask about some topical issues, following the announcement in Parliament yesterday about funding for the University of Dundee and some of the press comment that we have seen about the University of Edinburgh. If it is okay, we will continue the meeting a bit longer and widen out to look at those university issues. Willie Rennie has a question on that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Finally, I went back and read the article in yesterday’s The Times that you started off the evidence session by commenting on. I notice that you are not quoted in it at all; there are no direct quotes from you, as far as I can see from the online version. However, the article does say:
“The commissioner for fair access admitted widening access to deprived pupils on lower grades would mean more middle and upper-class pupils locked out of university, including some with stellar grades at high school.”
I know that those are not your words—a journalist was paraphrasing you—but what did you actually say? What comment would you like to make on the record to the Parliament’s committee on that issue?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Good morning, and welcome to the seventh meeting in 2025 of the Education, Children and Young People Committee. The first item on our agenda is consideration of a Scottish statutory instrument. This instrument is being considered under the negative procedure. Do members have any comments on the instrument?
Members indicated disagreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Douglas Ross
We will have the SFC at next week’s meeting, so we may also ask it some questions on that.
I thank all the witnesses for their time today; that evidence was really helpful.
12:21 Meeting continued in private until 12:49.Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you for that clarification. I expect that we will come on to that issue during our session with you.
First, I want to go back to your appointment. When you were appointed as commissioner for fair access, what did you want to achieve? Now, more than a year into the post, you have issued one report and are finalising your second report. What do you feel has been achieved in that time by yourself and others working collaboratively? What areas could have been actioned in the time that you have been in post that are still waiting to be progressed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Douglas Ross
Your first report was published in January last year, but it was September before the Government issued its response to your report. Is that the timescale that you were expecting, or would you benefit from greater urgency in the Government response?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Douglas Ross
We move to questions from John Mason.