The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1956 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Douglas Ross
Yes—absolutely.
We go to Willie Rennie.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Douglas Ross
Jordana, has your committee looked at that, or would it do so in the future? If there is good practice that is not being shared across the country, would that be of interest to members of your committee?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you very much. I will bring Beinn in. I am conscious of the time, but you are all giving very good answers.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you very much for that opening statement.
There is a lot in there that we will get into. I will first put this question to Kirsty, then we will go to Andy and Rebecca.
When did you first become aware that there was an issue? I made the point to Fiona Robertson when she appeared before our committee that it seemed to take many weeks—indeed, months—before the SQA launched its review. Did you know on exam results day that there was a major issue that would have to be thoroughly investigated, or did you think, at that time, that it was maybe just a blip?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Douglas Ross
You are right to say that our now being in January makes revisiting last year’s results difficult, but it did not necessarily have to be so difficult. If the SQA had taken immediate and prompt action, there might have been an opportunity to revisit the results in late summer rather than in January 2025. I want to press the SQA on that issue.
There were some stark comments in your review that were picked up by the press and others. Some of your members called the SQA’s independent—as it would call it—review a whitewash. They said that it was brushing things under the carpet. One of them said—I quoted this in the chamber a couple of weeks ago—that it was
“the most biased and useless investigation I have ever seen a public body attempt to pass off as legitimate”.
Those are not just small concerns. There is a feeling of fury among history teachers about what has happened and how it has affected them and their students, as well as about the way in which the investigation into everything was handled by the SQA. Is it fair to say that there is still a huge amount of anger, frustration and dissatisfaction among your members towards the SQA?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Douglas Ross
I got an email this morning from someone who was passing on comments. They said:
“Our members in schools are still raging that the webinars and materials from December and last week”
that are held by the SQA
“have still not been put online”.
Those who could not make it to the sessions are in the dark. As I mentioned before, they said that the SQA seems to be in “a defensive position” rather than trying to get the materials that teachers need to prepare their students.
As you said, the events were designed in response to significant concerns, but if that is the best that the SQA can come up with, it is clearly not delivering.
Was the SQA’s qualification manager present at the meeting for higher history?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Douglas Ross
Do you think that the only reason why it was published this time is perhaps that the cabinet secretary came in front of our committee and said that she would share it with us? The SQA was kind of boxed in at that point, was it not?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Douglas Ross
You should never be put in that position. We have discussed this before: you are volunteers. You represent your fellow history teachers. Surely the SQA would want that survey published and to be out there in public so that it can be held to account and so that it can improve. You should not in any way feel regret for having done that—the ones who should be regretting it are the ones who put you in that position in the first place.
I am sorry, Kirsty—I know that you wanted to come in on Pam Duncan-Glancy’s question, too.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Douglas Ross
Fiona Robertson mentioned variation across other subjects and used examples of subjects where there had been a drop, but there was nothing like that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Douglas Ross
This a question for you all. Has the issue been resolved as far as you think it is going to be resolved? The SQA seems to think that, since it was peer reviewed by someone from Wales, its independent review is the end of the matter. The Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills has suggested that it is. However, she said in the chamber a couple of weeks ago that she was going to continue communication with you and with members who are interested.
Ultimately, a cohort of students went into that exam in good faith and, based on the communication that I had have had, came out at the other side without the marks that were expected of them. Do you think that we need to look at the marks that were allocated and reassess last year’s exam paper and the results?