Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 20 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1956 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Is it the trade union, though? That communication does not mention a member of staff.

Another redaction that you asked for was point 5 in the final comment on page 56 of the survey, which says:

“More openness

Many appointees seem fearful of criticising the SQA due to reports of other appointees having been removed from marking duties for expressing critical views.”

That does not mention an individual member of staff that a union would be concerned about.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Okay, I am going to read out a final three comments. They are all redactions requested by you, whether through the union or not. When I read them out, can you tell me whether they name or identify one individual member of SQA?

You asked for a redaction on page 52 of the survey results where it says,

“needs an independent review … need to get rid of incompetent leaders and team managers”.

Does that identify any individual member of SQA staff—yes or no?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

It mentions “leaders” and “team managers”. You cannot identify an individual from that.

You also asked for this to be redacted from page 48:

“entirely new qualifications team. I have no confidence in the current leadership structure.”

Does that identify an individual member of SQA staff? It is speaking about the leadership structure.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

There were two unsatisfactory responses. He went to the escalated level only because his team were not getting anything, and he says that that has been an issue not only for his colleagues but for colleagues across the country.

You probably do not agree with that, but do you accept that teachers out there are saying that the email address looks like a publicity stunt and that it is not providing real help for teams across the country? That is what your own teachers are saying about the measures that the SQA has put in place.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

It says “leadership structure”. The leadership team is not a team of one.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Is it a team of one? Is it a team of one? Is it a team of one, Ms Stewart?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Is the team a team of one, Ms Stewart?

09:30  

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Interests

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Douglas Ross

Thank you very much.

That concludes the public part of our proceedings.

09:30 Meeting continued in private until 11:43.  

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Interests

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Douglas Ross

Good morning and welcome to the fourth meeting in 2025 of the Education, Children and Young People Committee.

I welcome Keith Brown, who is joining us as a committee member and replacing our previous colleague, Evelyn Tweed. On behalf of the committee, I thank Evelyn for her work as deputy convener and as a conscientious member of the committee.

As this is his first meeting as a committee member, I invite Keith to declare any relevant interests.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Douglas Ross

My understanding of that is that there was a question based on something that had been removed from the syllabus. It is almost as though a bank of questions had been written years ago and the question had been pulled out of that bank, but there had been no quality assurance before it went into the exam paper. Is that what you are trying to explain to us? Is that correct?