The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2871 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
I absolutely believe that we need to add a body, because otherwise we will have the status quo, which, despite the changes that might be happening and will continue to take place, has lost the trust of teachers and other professionals in the education sector in Scotland. In the debate on amendment 232, the cabinet secretary said that there is an inherent lack of trust. We all know that—the cabinet secretary accepts it and every single member of the committee, and probably of the Parliament, accepts it. Given that inherent lack of trust, having an independent body to look at such issues would resolve some of those points.
An independent regulator might have come to exactly the same conclusions as the SQA’s inquiry did last year, but it is more likely that those conclusions would have been accepted if they had come from an independent body rather than the SQA being seen to mark its own homework.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
I am not calling you to wind up quite yet. I will bring the cabinet secretary back in.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 271 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 130 disagreed to.
Amendment 275 moved—[Pam Duncan-Glancy].
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
There will be a division.
For
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD)
Against
Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP)
Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Haughey, Clare (Rutherglen) (SNP)
Mason, John (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind)
Ross, Douglas (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 6, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 276 disagreed to.
Amendment 277 not moved.
Amendment 278 moved—[Pam Duncan-Glancy].
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
There will be a division.
For
Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con)
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
Greer, Ross (West Scotland) (Green)
Rennie, Willie (North East Fife) (LD)
Ross, Douglas (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Haughey, Claire (Rutherglen) (SNP)
Mason, John (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind)
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 17 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
Amendment 77, in the name of Ross Greer, is grouped with amendments 78, 311, 314, 324, 325, 172, 326, 327, 329, 330, 91, 335, 336, 343 and 352.
I point out that amendment 311 is pre-empted by amendment 158; amendment 314 is pre-empted by amendment 162; and amendment 336 is pre-empted by amendment 179. Amendments 158, 162 and 336 were previously debated in the group entitled “Independence of the Chief Inspector”.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
I will wind up the debate by thanking the cabinet secretary and other members for their contributions. It has been a helpful and useful debate. There is general acceptance that there is an issue here. How we solve that issue is something that we can discuss on a cross-party basis. I agree that we should not tackle the issue in isolation.
I take on board the points that were made by Jackie Dunbar and the cabinet secretary, but we can only deal with what is in front of us—namely, the bill that we are seeking to amend.
I remember the cabinet secretary’s final words to me in our call on Monday. She said that she was going to look at the art of the possible with regard to this matter and, I hope, others. With a view to our looking at the art of the possible and having further discussions about that, I am not minded to press amendment 297.
Amendment 297, by agreement, withdrawn.
Amendments 298 to 301 not moved.