The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2871 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Is the success of graduate apprenticeships not a compelling enough reason to override the moratorium?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
I am sorry, Mr Boyle, but you are appearing before a parliamentary committee whose job it is to scrutinise the bill. This is our first evidence session on the bill. You prepare for these sessions. You said earlier that you were the interim chief executive of the Scottish Funding Council; I presume that people in that organisation told you that you would be asked questions about this, that and the other, and that one of them would be about the cost of the bill—that is, how much it will cost, if the bill is put into law, to transfer people across from SDS and for the SFC to take on the responsibilities in question. As a representative of the Scottish Funding Council, which is an agency of the Scottish Government, are you saying that you have no clue whatsoever of the cost of the proposed legislation, if it is passed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
But you know that SDS has done that work, because it is saying that the cost will be £30 million. You know that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Amendment 320, in the name of Pam Duncan-Glancy, is grouped with amendments 344 and 353.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
I call Pam Duncan-Glancy to wind up and to press or withdraw amendment 320.
Amendment 320, by agreement, withdrawn.
Amendment 321 not moved.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Well, you do, because you have spent a £10 million underspend on one university just this year. This is not hypothetical—it is exactly what the Funding Council has done in the past couple of months.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
So it could happen.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
No. This was funding that the SFC had not spent—that is what we were told when we had the SFC’s director of finance in front of us. We were told that it was a general underspend that would have been returned to the Scottish Government. What if there is a general underspend in the apprenticeship budget and there is another call for £10 million for universities, as we have just had for Dundee? Are you saying that, even if you have not spent all your money on apprenticeships, you will not provide that money to struggling universities or colleges?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
I am grateful to Ross Greer for making those points and for his support of the points that I have made. That crystallises my view that something is required in the bill. I am interested to hear the cabinet secretary’s response and the further discussions that we will have.
A point that I put to the former chief executive of the SQA is that, if the body was so sure of its internal investigation, it would have had no fear or concern about having an independent review. If the SQA is happy with its procedures and with everything that it is doing and believes that it is effective and functioning properly, it should not be concerned about an independent regulator being put in place, because such a regulator would have nothing to investigate if everything is fine. I hope that that is a helpful discussion for us to have.
There is a deficiency in this area in the current set-up, which I would not like to see being replicated in the new body. With the bill, we have a unique and fairly rare—I realise that something cannot be both unique and fairly rare—opportunity to change the education structures in Scotland. In considering the creation of the new qualifications Scotland body, we have an ideal opportunity to debate the issue, which is what I am seeking to do with the amendments in my name.
I move amendment 297.
19:30Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Douglas Ross
The result of the division is: For 9, Against 0, Abstentions 1.
Amendment 17 agreed to
Section 25, as amended, agreed to.
After section 25
Amendment 73 moved—[Jenny Gilruth]—and agreed to.
Amendments 287 to 289 not moved.