The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2754 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
I remind members that, if amendment 206 is agreed to, I will not be able to call amendment 207, due to pre-emption.
Amendment 206 not moved.
Amendments 207 and 352 not moved.
Amendment 108 moved—[Jenny Gilruth]—and agreed to.
Amendments 109, 110, 208 and 353 not moved.
Amendment 23 moved—[Ross Greer].
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
The question is, that amendment 113 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Are you pressing it, therefore?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
That concludes our consideration of the bill at stage 2.
I thank the cabinet secretary, her officials, committee members and others who have lodged amendments and allowed us to debate the issues. I also make a special mention of broadcasting, the official report and others who have facilitated our long meetings well into the evening hours. I thank our clerks and the entire committee team for their work on the bill. Finally, we are also grateful to the legislation team, who, as I know from personal experience, take members’ ideas and put them into a form that can be debated.
With those remarks, I close the meeting.
Meeting closed at 22:05.Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
On that point, have the bodies that will be involved, and indeed the Scottish Government, learned enough from past mistakes? Professor Seaton, you said that history is littered with examples of where more funding and better resources could have been allocated. Are we in Scotland—the Government in particular, and the bodies involved in the bill—good enough at learning from the mistakes of the past?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
You will have seen some of the criticism of the bill from others, including those whom we will hear from today, but do you think that it is a good and adequate bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
In your submission, you say:
“Many employers do not believe that the Scottish labour market will be able to support the delivery of their future business plans and are facing immediate impacts with potential delays on their critical projects.”
Do you think that that issue will be resolved through the bill and, more widely, through what you heard in the programme for government yesterday?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
I thought that you might have had a wider discussion about that when you were discussing the bill. Did you look at examples elsewhere in the UK or wider international examples?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
I understand your answer, but we are scrutinising a bill, and you, as our first panel of witnesses, are saying that funding and resourcing are concerns. You are saying, from your vast experience, that there is a legitimate concern that the bill, if it is passed, will not be resourced properly and that we will meet the same pitfalls as we have in the past. What can the Government or these bodies do to reassure you that this time it will be different, or is it impossible to get that reassurance?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Douglas Ross
Before I go to Jackie Dunbar, I want to know whether you have had any explanation from ministers or officials as to the reason for not supporting the recommendations in the OECD report. Is there anything that prevents them from taking on those recommendations? Has that topic been raised with the other panel members?