The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2633 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Douglas Ross
I have a final question about the report that came out today. I know that we are here to discuss future legislation, but I think that the report is important, as it will frame our thoughts and discussions as we move forward. Of the £500 million that was announced for the whole family wellbeing fund, only £148 million has been allocated. Why is that money not getting out the door? What is blocking that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Douglas Ross
But it is the Government that holds the purse strings, so if the process were to be simplified, it would be on the Government to do that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Douglas Ross
That is understandable. She blamed local authorities. She said that the Government has put up the money but it has not been spent locally, and basically told listeners of BBC Radio Scotland that you are the blockage. Has COSLA fed in to the Government to say, “Look, this is too complex; we need to make this a more streamlined approach”?
This is important money. The headline figure is £500 million. We all welcome that and want to see it paid out, but the fact that only £148 million has been delivered is a worry. What has COSLA said about that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Douglas Ross
I will move on to questions from Pam Duncan-Glancy in a moment, but first, Mr Savege, you said in response to Mr Rennie—this was quite a stark warning—that the bill could “take us backwards”. However, in the SOLACE submission, you said that you agree with the overall ambitions of the bill. How can you agree with something that you think could be a backwards step?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Douglas Ross
That is what I am asking. Is it possible, based on the framework, for the bill to be improved? Advocacy is a strong element of what is in the bill, and others are saying that it needs to be strengthened even further. I am just worried that you think that the bill could take us backwards.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you very much.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Douglas Ross
In response to Mr Kidd, Ms Whitelock and Mr Savege, you both said that the Government could have engaged with you more. This is a team process, particularly in relation to the Promise. Do you feel snubbed because the Government did not come to you? Why did it not? On a bill of such importance, you are not the first witnesses to tell us that there was no Government outreach. Do you feel snubbed? If so, why?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Douglas Ross
When the report mentions that plans lack detail and direction, and that greater pace and momentum are needed, where does the lack of those qualities come from? Is it from individual local authorities? Is it IJBs? Is it the Government? Those are criticisms, and I just want to know who is to blame here.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Douglas Ross
Why is that still work in progress when we are midway through the 10-year period? Did no one think, in 2020, that they should set up a system to track progress and ensure that they would meet the 2030 target, instead of still trying to come up with a system at this mid-point?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Douglas Ross
On that final point, the committee met a number of people last night. It was an enlightening session. I certainly picked up on a frustration that things have dragged on for too long, although I do not want to go as far as to say that there is frustration here this morning.
You have all said that you welcome the report, but I am not sure that we should be welcoming it, because it is quite a damning report and it follows hot on the heels of the Promise oversight board’s report in February. These reports regularly say that we are not doing enough, we are not moving fast enough and there is no clear direction. Should we really be welcoming the report, or should we be worried about it? Mr Savege, I see that you want to come back in.