The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1294 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Liz Smith
Good morning. You said that the world is changing in terms of how democracy operates and so on. Is that change one of the reasons for some of the issues that public inquiries face, and could you tell us what that is?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Liz Smith
You are—that is an interesting dimension. However, do you think that, in the much more unsettled world that we are living in today, the change in democracy is causing frustration—perhaps, in some cases, anger—among the public, who want to try to press Governments to deliver something that they are not delivering? Is there a frustration that Governments are failing?
11:15Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Liz Smith
I will come back to the question of the policy inquiries in just a minute. First, I want to ask you, Dr Prasser, about the Australian situation. Do you perceive that there is growing disquiet with public services?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Liz Smith
When I asked the two gentlemen in the first session today whether Sweden and Australia have seen a growth in investigative public inquiries, as distinct from policy ones, because that frustration is growing, I think that both answered that they have probably not, but we are definitely seeing that in Scotland. There is a concern and a frustration out there—which some of our witnesses have put to us already—that Government agencies are not delivering public services of the right quality, particularly in health, justice and education, and that is raising the tempo. Is it the same in New Zealand?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Liz Smith
Good morning. Thank you very much for coming to speak to us from your various parts of the world.
One of the issues that we face in Scotland is that we are being asked to conduct an increasing number of public inquiries because of a perceived failure of public services. We have had quite a number of inquiries set up because services—whether it is the health service, the education service or justice service—are just not performing. Are you seeing that trend in relation to your royal commissions or investigations in Sweden or Australia? I will go to Professor Dahlström first.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Liz Smith
On that topic, I will ask about the Australian situation. You mentioned in an answer to the convener that there are occasions where new directives are set out. Could you give an example of where the terms of reference have been changed or extended?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Liz Smith
That is very helpful. In those circumstances, would the people who want the public inquiry—perhaps they are victims of some perceived malpractice—be pressurising the Government to make changes?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Liz Smith
Yes, it is very helpful. The more that each of you talks about your own jurisdiction, the more it comes across that your situation is very different from what is happening in Scotland. Namely, quite a lot of your inquiries or commissions are about policy issues, whereas we are seeing an increasing number of investigative public inquiries.
In the investigative inquiries that you have—though they may be few in number—do you find that those who have asked for the inquiry or who are involved in the situation that is being investigated are generally satisfied at the end of the inquiry? Do you find that there is general satisfaction that the inquiry has come up with the right result and has been able to ascertain where blame might lie or has increased accountability?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you very much. Is it the case in Sweden as well, that generally speaking, there is reasonable satisfaction with the process?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you both. Lastly, is the public generally satisfied that these inquiries do not cost too much and that the timescale is acceptable or do you have kickback from the public in your countries about such inquiries becoming a bit too expensive or that too much time is taken up on them?