The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1200 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Liz Smith
Are you able to access the information that you require relatively quickly?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Liz Smith
We will go to Wales first.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Liz Smith
Thank you, Professor Martin. The distinction that you have made between the two processes with regard to advising ministers is interesting. How easy do you find the second process—that is, looking at the evidence and guiding the minister to the data that might have been there previous to the decision that is made? Are you data rich or are there gaps in the knowledge that you have to provide to the minister?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Liz Smith
Can you give us an example of a time when different types of evidence have pointed in different directions and the difficulties that that might have caused?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Liz Smith
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Liz Smith
I entirely accept the point about cost of living issues, inflation and so on—that is absolutely accurate. However, you seem to be suggesting that more information will have to come forward in order to make the second financial memorandum more accurate.
You said that you are having a meeting on 5 June. Can you explain to us your expectations of the additional information that you are looking for so that the committee can be more confident that the second financial memorandum is more reflective of the true costs than the first attempt?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Liz Smith
No committee could expect the figures in any financial memorandum to be absolutely spot-on first time round—that is a given, as Parliament’s experience tells us.
Nevertheless, we are on the back of having a look at the first financial memorandum for the proposed national care service, which—as you know—was found, by general consensus, to be very seriously lacking, to the extent that this committee sent it back because it was just not good enough. If we come to a point at which a second financial memorandum is required, that would mean, by implication, either that additional information is forthcoming or that there would be an updated set of statistics that builds on the first financial memorandum.
I am interested to know to what extent you think that the meeting that you are having with stakeholders will bring forward any additional information, because I suggest that that is the expectation.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Liz Smith
The bill stands to benefit a little bit—as I understand it, other committees have been looking at it, and there is general agreement that the principles of it are good. The concern is that if we are not going to get the second financial memorandum until after stage 1 is completed, that raises questions about the process between stage 1 and stage 2. As the Finance and Public Administration Committee, it is our job to make sure that the process is absolutely watertight and that, between those two stages, the relevant information is put before the Parliament.
As I said, that has been a concern for us with previous bills. Can you give us an undertaking that that will happen so that the new financial memorandum is much more accurate on what the figures will be?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Liz Smith
That is helpful.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Liz Smith
If we find ourselves in a situation in which a particular policy has failed to deliver the good intention, which sometimes happens, are there adequate processes to ensure that a proper review takes place to establish why the good intention was not implemented and to ask what will be done about it the next time, or do we need to make changes to the existing processes? One difficulty is that the Parliament’s post-legislative facility is quite limited—for a start, we do not have a revising chamber, nor do committees have much time to look at what happens when a policy goes wrong. What could be done to mitigate that and to improve the process so that, if there are failures, we do something about them?